Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kelvin and rossby-gravity wave packets in the lower stratosphere of some high-top CMIP5 models

  • F. Lott
  • , S. N. Denvilbutchart
  • , C. Cagnazzo
  • , M. A. Giorgetta
  • , S. C. Hardiman
  • , E. Manzini
  • , T. Krismer
  • , J. P. Duvel
  • , P. Maury
  • , J. F. Scinocca
  • , S. Watanabe
  • , S. Yukimoto
  • Service d'Aéronomie
  • Now at Met Office Hadley Centre
  • Ev-K2-CNR Committee
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • Université Pierre et Marie Curie
  • University of Victoria
  • JAMSTEC
  • JMA Meteorological Research Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We analyze the stratospheric Kelvin and Rossby-gravity wave packets with periods of a few days in nine high-top (i.e., with stratosphere) models of the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). These models simulate realistic aspects of these waves and represent them better than the tropospheric convectively coupled waves analyzed in previous studies. There is nevertheless a large spread among the models, and those with a quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) produce larger amplitude waves than the models without a QBO. For the Rossby-gravity waves this is explained by the fact that models without a QBO never have positive zonal mean zonal winds in the lower stratosphere, a situation that is favorable to the propagation of Rossby-gravity waves. For the Kelvin waves, larger amplitudes in the presence of a QBO is counter intuitive because Kelvin waves are expected to have larger amplitude when the zonal mean zonal wind is negative, and this is always satisfied in models without a QBO. We attribute the larger amplitude to the fact that models tuned to have a QBO require finer vertical resolution in the stratosphere. We also find that models with large precipitation variability tend to produce larger amplitude waves. However, the effect is not as pronounced as was found in previous studies. In fact, even models with weak precipitation variability still have quite realistic stratospheric waves, indicating either that (i) other sources can be significant or that (ii) the dynamical filtering mitigates the differences in the sources between models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2156-2173
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
Volume119
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kelvin and rossby-gravity wave packets in the lower stratosphere of some high-top CMIP5 models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this