Large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet

Julien Dandois, Ivan Mary, Vincent Brion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet on an airfoil at a Mach number M = 0.735, an angle of attack α = 4°, a Reynolds number Rec = 3 × 106 has been carried out. The boundary layer is laminar up to the shock foot and laminar/turbulent transition occurs in the separation bubble at the shock foot. Contrary to the turbulent case for which wall pressure spectra are characterised by well-marked peaks at low frequencies (St = f.c/U ≃ 0:06-0:07, where St is the Strouhal number, f the shock oscillation frequency, c the chord length and U the free-stream velocity), in the laminar case, there are also well-marked peaks but at a much higher frequency (St = 1:2). The shock oscillation amplitude is also lower: 6% of chord and limited to the shock foot area in the laminar case instead of 20% with a whole shock oscillation and intermittent boundary layer separation and reattachment in the turbulent case. The analysis of the phase-averaged fields allowed linking of the frequency of the laminar transonic buffet to a separation bubble breathing phenomenon associated with a vortex shedding mechanism. These vortices are convected at Uc=U ≃ 0:4 (where Uc is the convection velocity). The main finding of the present paper is that the higher frequency of the shock oscillation in the laminar regime is due to a different mechanism than in the turbulent one: Laminar transonic buffet is due to a separation bubble breathing phenomenon occurring at the shock foot.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-178
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Fluid Mechanics
Volume850
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sept 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • compressible flows
  • shock waves
  • turbulent transition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Large-eddy simulation of laminar transonic buffet'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this