Les critères de qualité en médecine : jusqu'où aller ?

E. Minvielle

doi:10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010

Les critères de qualité en médecine : jusqu'où aller ?

Translated title of the contribution: Quality criteria in medicine: which limits?

E. Minvielle

INSERM U869

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

Abstract

This article aims to develop a critical appraisal of the criteria's development in medicine. The COMPAQH (Coordination for Measuring Performance and Assuring Quality in Hospitals) project (Ministry of Health/ High Authority of Health/ National Institute of Medical Research) helps to support this analysis. This project based on the test of 42 Quality indicators (QI) gives findings not only about the manner to build criteria, but also to interpret and diffuse results among physicians and hospital managers. Criteria must be elaborated in a pragmatic way. They must be in compliance with practice guidelines supported by scientific evidences. The associated risk is to create and develop a normative medicine. Collaboration with professional societies may be useful in preventing this risk.

Translated title of the contribution	Quality criteria in medicine: which limits?
Original language	French
Pages (from-to)	184-191
Number of pages	8
Journal	Annales d'Urologie
Volume	40
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2006
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010

Cite this

@article{0c3d56f1339e41aa86a6da82b5a011f9,

title = "Les crit{\`e}res de qualit{\'e} en m{\'e}decine : jusqu'o{\`u} aller ?",

abstract = "This article aims to develop a critical appraisal of the criteria's development in medicine. The COMPAQH (Coordination for Measuring Performance and Assuring Quality in Hospitals) project (Ministry of Health/ High Authority of Health/ National Institute of Medical Research) helps to support this analysis. This project based on the test of 42 Quality indicators (QI) gives findings not only about the manner to build criteria, but also to interpret and diffuse results among physicians and hospital managers. Criteria must be elaborated in a pragmatic way. They must be in compliance with practice guidelines supported by scientific evidences. The associated risk is to create and develop a normative medicine. Collaboration with professional societies may be useful in preventing this risk.",

keywords = "Practice guidelines, Quality indicators",

author = "E. Minvielle",

year = "2006",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010",

language = "Fran{\c c}ais",

volume = "40",

pages = "184--191",

journal = "Annales d'Urologie",

issn = "0003-4401",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Les critères de qualité en médecine

T2 - jusqu'où aller ?

AU - Minvielle, E.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - This article aims to develop a critical appraisal of the criteria's development in medicine. The COMPAQH (Coordination for Measuring Performance and Assuring Quality in Hospitals) project (Ministry of Health/ High Authority of Health/ National Institute of Medical Research) helps to support this analysis. This project based on the test of 42 Quality indicators (QI) gives findings not only about the manner to build criteria, but also to interpret and diffuse results among physicians and hospital managers. Criteria must be elaborated in a pragmatic way. They must be in compliance with practice guidelines supported by scientific evidences. The associated risk is to create and develop a normative medicine. Collaboration with professional societies may be useful in preventing this risk.

AB - This article aims to develop a critical appraisal of the criteria's development in medicine. The COMPAQH (Coordination for Measuring Performance and Assuring Quality in Hospitals) project (Ministry of Health/ High Authority of Health/ National Institute of Medical Research) helps to support this analysis. This project based on the test of 42 Quality indicators (QI) gives findings not only about the manner to build criteria, but also to interpret and diffuse results among physicians and hospital managers. Criteria must be elaborated in a pragmatic way. They must be in compliance with practice guidelines supported by scientific evidences. The associated risk is to create and develop a normative medicine. Collaboration with professional societies may be useful in preventing this risk.

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Quality indicators

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33745008426

U2 - 10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010

DO - 10.1016/j.anuro.2006.01.010

M3 - Bref sondage

C2 - 16869540

AN - SCOPUS:33745008426

SN - 0003-4401

VL - 40

SP - 184

EP - 191

JO - Annales d'Urologie

JF - Annales d'Urologie

IS - 3

ER -

Les critères de qualité en médecine : jusqu'où aller ?

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this