Abstract
This article presents a research on the capacity of candidates for nominations to integrate new mobilities in their election platform during the municipal elections of March 2014. From the corpus of electoral declarations in Yvelines, an analysis was undertaken through a hierarchical top-down classification generated by the lexical statistics software, IRaMuTeQ. The results highlighted several paradoxes: mobility is a lever for development and preservation of the living environment. New mobilities are displayed as an isolated and universal solution, without spatial anchoring, showing fuzzy technical-urban skills. They are not associated with innovation. The discussion focuses on the ambivalence of these mobility discourses.
| Translated title of the contribution | “Innovative” and “sustainable” mobilities in electoral speeches: Words to move the local |
|---|---|
| Original language | French |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-22 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Geocarrefour |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '“Innovative” and “sustainable” mobilities in electoral speeches: Words to move the local'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver