Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Making random choices invisible to the scheduler

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

When dealing with process calculi and automata which express both nondeterministic and probabilistic behavior, it is customary to introduce the notion of scheduler to resolve the nondeterminism. It has been observed that for certain applications, notably those in security, the scheduler needs to be restricted so not to reveal the outcome of the protocol's random choices, or otherwise the model of adversary would be too strong even for "obviously correct" protocols. We propose a process-algebraic framework in which the control on the scheduler can be specified in syntactic terms, and we show how to apply it to solve the problem mentioned above. We also consider the definition of (probabilistic) may and must preorders, and we show that they are precongruences with respect to the restricted schedulers. Furthermore, we show that all the operators of the language, except replication, distribute over probabilistic summation, which is a useful property for verification.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCONCUR 2007 - Concurrency Theory - 18th International Conference, CONCUR 2007, Proceedings
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages42-58
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9783540744061
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007
Event18th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2007 - Lisbon, Portugal
Duration: 3 Sept 20078 Sept 2007

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume4703 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference18th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2007
Country/TerritoryPortugal
CityLisbon
Period3/09/078/09/07

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making random choices invisible to the scheduler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this