Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management of ocular toxoplasmosis in France: Results of a modified Delphi study

  • M. Schaeffer
  • , L. Ballonzoli
  • , D. Gaucher
  • , C. Arndt
  • , K. Angioi-Duprez
  • , R. Baudonnet
  • , B. Bodaghi
  • , A. Bron
  • , F. Chiambaretta
  • , B. Cimon
  • , C. Chiquet
  • , C. Creuzot-Garcher
  • , V. Daien
  • , A. S. Deleplanque
  • , H. Fricker-Hidalgo
  • , E. Hadjadj
  • , S. Houze
  • , T. Ifrah
  • , J. F. Korobelnik
  • , P. Labalette
  • M. Laure Le Lez, C. L'Ollivier, M. Mercie, F. Mouriaux, L. Paris, H. Pelloux, C. Pomares, J. C. Quintyn, M. B. Rougier, A. Rousseau, V. Soler, M. Talmud, I. Villena, O. Villard, C. Speeg-Schatz, T. Bourcier, A. Sauer
  • Strasbourg University Hospital
  • CHU de Reims
  • Clinical Investigation Center
  • Limoges University Hospital
  • Groupe Hospitalier Lariboisiere-Fernand Widal Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris (AP-HP)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon
  • France; Université Clermont Auvergne
  • CHRU Strasbourg
  • CHU Grenoble
  • University Hospital of Montpellier
  • CHU Lille
  • Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille
  • Medical and Infectious Diseases ICU (MI2)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
  • CHU Bordeaux
  • CHRU de Tours
  • CHU Marseille
  • Université et CHU de Poitiers
  • CHU de Rennes
  • Sorbonne Université
  • CHU de Nice
  • Pneumologie & Médecine Nucléaire CHU
  • Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
  • CHU Toulouse
  • Univ. de Reims Champagne Ardenne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate diagnostic and therapeutic practices and then establish a consensus on the management of ocular toxoplasmosis in France through a Delphi study. Materials and methods: Twenty-three French experts in ocular toxoplasmosis were invited to respond to a modified Delphi study conducted online, in the form of two questionnaires, in an attempt to establish a consensus on the diagnosis and management of this pathology. The threshold for identical responses to reach consensus was set at 70 %. Results: The responses of 19 experts out of the 23 selected were obtained on the first questionnaire and 16 experts on the second. The main elements agreed upon by the experts were to treat patients with a decrease in visual acuity or an infectious focus within the posterior pole, to treat peripheral lesions only in the presence of significant inflammation, the prescription of first-line treatment with pyrimethamine-azithromycin, the use of corticosteroid therapy after a period of 24 to 48 hours, the prophylaxis of frequent recurrences (more than 2 episodes per year) with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as well as the implementation of prophylactic treatment of recurrences in immunocompromised patients. On the other hand, no consensus emerged with regard to the examinations to be carried out for the etiological diagnosis (anterior chamber paracentesis, fluorescein angiography, serology, etc.), second-line treatment (in the case of failure of first-line treatment), or treatment of peripheral foci. Conclusion: This study lays the foundations for possible randomized scientific studies to be conducted to clarify the management of ocular toxoplasmosis, on the one hand to confirm consensual clinical practices and on the other hand to guide practices for which no formal consensus has been demonstrated.

Translated title of the contributionPrise en charge de la toxoplasmose oculaire en France: résultats d'une étude Delphi modifiée
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-422
Number of pages10
JournalJournal Francais d'Ophtalmologie
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Anti-inflammatory
  • Anti-parasitic
  • Delphi method
  • Delphi study
  • Ocular toxoplasmosis
  • Treatment
  • Uveitis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Management of ocular toxoplasmosis in France: Results of a modified Delphi study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this