Abstract
The standard estimation approaches and their implementation generally assume well-specified models. What is feasible and unfeasible when the models are misspecified is discussed. An adjustment method is introduced for forecasts based on misspecified models. The key roles of the object of interest and of the management of validation samples are highlighted. The approach is used to derive forecast intervals robust to misspecification, to quantify the required capital for model risk in prudential supervision, to measure treatment effects with pseudo-models, or to jointly manage a set of pseudo-models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-22 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Econometrics and Statistics |
| Volume | 17 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Audit
- Difference of Difference
- Misspecification
- Model Choice
- Model Risk
- Model Valuation
- Prudential Regulation
- Scoring
- Treatment Effect
- Validation Sample
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Model risk management: Valuation and governance of pseudo-models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver