TY - JOUR
T1 - Modeling of Tunneling Distance Among Nearby Carbon Nanofibers to Control the Tunneling Resistance and Electrical Conductivity of Composites
AU - Zare, Yasser
AU - Munir, Muhammad Tajammal
AU - Rhee, Kyong Yop
AU - Park, Soo Jin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Society of Plastics Engineers.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - A larger tunnel in polymer carbon nanofiber (CNF) composites (PCNFs) constrains the electron transport within nanocomposites, as these tunnels comprise adjacent nanoparticles separated by an insulating polymer film. However, the tunneling distance (λ) remains an unidentified parameter, which has not been thoroughly explored in previous studies. In this paper, we develop the Weber–Kamal and Deng–Zheng models for PCNF conductivity and assess their predictive accuracy using experimental data. The progressed expressions are then related to state the λ as a function of CNF concentration, percolation threshold, CNF size, interphase depth, CNF waviness, contact number, network fraction, and contact diameter. The effect of each parameter on λ is examined to validate the proposed equation. A lower percolation threshold, greater interphase depth, reduced waviness, higher contact number, larger contact diameter, and increased network fraction result in narrower tunnels. The maximum λ of 40 nm is noticed at the CNF radius (R) of 90 nm with a CNF length of 50 μm; nevertheless, R < 57 nm reduces λ to 1 nm. Consequently, the thickest and shortest CNFs yield the largest tunnels, while the narrowest tunnels are produced by the thinnest CNFs. These data emphasize the momentous impact of CNF size on the tunneling size manipulating the nanocomposite conductivity.
AB - A larger tunnel in polymer carbon nanofiber (CNF) composites (PCNFs) constrains the electron transport within nanocomposites, as these tunnels comprise adjacent nanoparticles separated by an insulating polymer film. However, the tunneling distance (λ) remains an unidentified parameter, which has not been thoroughly explored in previous studies. In this paper, we develop the Weber–Kamal and Deng–Zheng models for PCNF conductivity and assess their predictive accuracy using experimental data. The progressed expressions are then related to state the λ as a function of CNF concentration, percolation threshold, CNF size, interphase depth, CNF waviness, contact number, network fraction, and contact diameter. The effect of each parameter on λ is examined to validate the proposed equation. A lower percolation threshold, greater interphase depth, reduced waviness, higher contact number, larger contact diameter, and increased network fraction result in narrower tunnels. The maximum λ of 40 nm is noticed at the CNF radius (R) of 90 nm with a CNF length of 50 μm; nevertheless, R < 57 nm reduces λ to 1 nm. Consequently, the thickest and shortest CNFs yield the largest tunnels, while the narrowest tunnels are produced by the thinnest CNFs. These data emphasize the momentous impact of CNF size on the tunneling size manipulating the nanocomposite conductivity.
KW - carbon nanofiber
KW - conductivity
KW - interphase area
KW - modeling
KW - nanocomposite
KW - tunnel size
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019545629
U2 - 10.1002/pc.70569
DO - 10.1002/pc.70569
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019545629
SN - 0272-8397
JO - Polymer Composites
JF - Polymer Composites
ER -