Abstract
Designing efficient and fair algorithms for sharing multiple resources between heterogeneous demands is becoming increasingly important. Applications include compute clusters shared by multi-task jobs and routers equipped with middleboxes shared by ows of different types. We show that the currently preferred objective of Dominant Resource Fairness (DRF) has a significantly less favorable efficiency-fairness tradeoff than alternatives like Proportional Fairness and our proposal, Bottleneck Max Fairness. We propose practical algorithms to realize these sharing objectives and evaluate their performance under a stochastic demand model. It is shown, in particular, that the strategyproofness property that motivated the choice of DRF for an assumed fixed set of jobs or ows, is largely irrelevant when demand is dynamic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 31-42 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Performance Evaluation Review |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Jun 2015 |
| Event | ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, SIGMETRICS 2015 - Portland, United States Duration: 15 Jun 2015 → 19 Jun 2015 |
Keywords
- Bottleneck Max Fairness
- Cluster computing
- Dominant Resource Fairness
- Multi-resource sharing
- Proportional Fairness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-resource fairness: Objectives, algorithms and performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver