TY - JOUR
T1 - NAITRE study on the impact of conditional cash transfer on poor pregnancy outcomes in underprivileged women
T2 - Protocol for a nationwide pragmatic cluster-randomised superiority clinical trial in France
AU - on behalf of theNAITRE Study Group
AU - Bardou, Marc
AU - Crépon, Bruno
AU - Bertaux, Anne Claire
AU - Godard-Marceaux, Aurélie
AU - Eckman-Lacroix, Astrid
AU - Thellier, Elise
AU - Falchier, Frédérique
AU - Deruelle, Philippe
AU - Doret, Muriel
AU - Carcopino-Tusoli, Xavier
AU - Schmitz, Thomas
AU - Barjat, Thiphaine
AU - Morin, Mathieu
AU - Perrotin, Franck
AU - Hatem, Ghada
AU - Deneux-Tharaux, Catherine
AU - Fournel, Isabelle
AU - Laforet, Laurent
AU - Meunier-Beillard, Nicolas
AU - Duflo, Esther
AU - Le Ray, Isabelle
AU - Riethmuller, Didier
AU - Bourtembourg, Aude
AU - Mottet, Nicolas
AU - Toubin, Claire
AU - Boiteux, Guillaume
AU - Senat, Marie Victoire
AU - Houlier, Marie
AU - Neveu, Marie Emmanuelle
AU - Farbre, Solène
AU - Merviel, Philippe
AU - Catteau, Eliane
AU - Deplanque, Dominique
AU - Blanc, Julie
AU - Vaugirard, Valérie
AU - Athlani, Muriel
AU - Pettazzoni, Sandrine
AU - Lesavre, Nathalie
AU - Laurenceau, Nathalie
AU - Leroux, Anne
AU - Nikel, Lauriane
AU - Gustave, Elodie
AU - Jacqz-Aigrin,
AU - Chauleur, Celine
AU - Buchmuller, Andréa
AU - Vayssiere, Christophe
AU - Viallon, Anne
AU - Guerin, Catherine
AU - Diguisto, Caroline
AU - Chretien, Stephanie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Introduction Prenatal care is recommended during pregnancy to improve neonatal and maternal outcomes. Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are less compliant to recommended prenatal care and suffer a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Several attempts to encourage optimal pregnancy follow-up have shown controversial results, particularly in high-income countries. Few studies have assessed financial incentives to encourage prenatal care, and none reported materno-fetal events as the primary outcome. Our study aims to determine whether financial incentives could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with low SES in a high-income country. Methods and analysis This pragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial includes pregnant women with the following criteria: (1) age above 18 years, (2) first pregnancy visit before 26 weeks of gestation and (3) belonging to a socioeconomically disadvantaged group. The intervention consists in offering financial incentives conditional on attending scheduled pregnancy follow-up consultations. Clusters are 2-month periods with random turnover across centres. A composite outcome of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include maternal or neonatal outcomes assessed separately, qualitative assessment of the perception of the intervention and cost-effectiveness analysis for which children will be followed to the end of their first year through the French health insurance database. The study started in June 2016, and based on an expected decrease in the primary endpoint from 18% to 14% in the intervention group, we plan to include 2000 women in each group. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was first gained on 28 September 2014. An independent data security and monitoring committee has been established. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number NCT02402855; pre-results.
AB - Introduction Prenatal care is recommended during pregnancy to improve neonatal and maternal outcomes. Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are less compliant to recommended prenatal care and suffer a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Several attempts to encourage optimal pregnancy follow-up have shown controversial results, particularly in high-income countries. Few studies have assessed financial incentives to encourage prenatal care, and none reported materno-fetal events as the primary outcome. Our study aims to determine whether financial incentives could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with low SES in a high-income country. Methods and analysis This pragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial includes pregnant women with the following criteria: (1) age above 18 years, (2) first pregnancy visit before 26 weeks of gestation and (3) belonging to a socioeconomically disadvantaged group. The intervention consists in offering financial incentives conditional on attending scheduled pregnancy follow-up consultations. Clusters are 2-month periods with random turnover across centres. A composite outcome of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include maternal or neonatal outcomes assessed separately, qualitative assessment of the perception of the intervention and cost-effectiveness analysis for which children will be followed to the end of their first year through the French health insurance database. The study started in June 2016, and based on an expected decrease in the primary endpoint from 18% to 14% in the intervention group, we plan to include 2000 women in each group. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was first gained on 28 September 2014. An independent data security and monitoring committee has been established. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number NCT02402855; pre-results.
KW - Clinical governance
KW - Maternal medicine
KW - Organisation of health services
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017321
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017321
M3 - Article
C2 - 29084796
AN - SCOPUS:85032709612
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 7
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 10
M1 - 017321
ER -