Abstract
To limit global warming to <2°C we must reduce the net amount of CO2 we release into the atmosphere, either by producing less CO2 (conventional mitigation) or by capturing more CO2 (negative emissions). Here, using state-of-the-art carbon-climate models, we quantify the trade-off between these two options in RCP2.6: an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scenario likely to limit global warming below 2°C. In our best-case illustrative assumption of conventional mitigation, negative emissions of 0.5-3Gt C (gigatonnes of carbon) per year and storage capacity of 50-250Gt C are required. In our worst case, those requirements are 7-11Gt C per year and 1,000-1,600Gt C, respectively. Because these figures have not been shown to be feasible, we conclude that development of negative emission technologies should be accelerated, but also that conventional mitigation must remain a substantial part of any climate policy aiming at the 2-°C target.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 7958 |
| Journal | Nature Communications |
| Volume | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 3 Aug 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2°C'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver