Abstract
For object reallocation problems, TTC is the leading rule: if preferences are strict but otherwise unrestricted, it is the only rule satisfying efficiency, the endowments lower bounds, and strategy-proofness (Ma, 1994); moreover, it is the only rule satisfying the endowments lower bounds, strategy-proofness, and endowment-swapping-proofness (Fujinaka and Wakayama, 2018). We focus on the domain of single-dipped preferences, and ask whether these results hold there. We show that they do. Returning to preferences that are strict but otherwise unrestricted, TTC is not “obviously strategy-proof” (Li, 2017). Again we ask if this remains true on the domain of single-dipped preferences, and show that on this domain, TTC does satisfy this property. Moreover, the domain of single-dipped preferences is a maximal domain on which TTC is obviously strategy-proof.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 181-196 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Games and Economic Behavior |
| Volume | 140 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Object reallocation problems
- Obvious strategy-proofness
- Single-dipped preferences
- TTC