Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On the correlation between convective plume updrafts and downdrafts, lidar reflectivity and depolarization ratio

  • Fabien Gibert
  • , Juan Cuesta
  • , Jun Ichi Yano
  • , Nicolas Arnault
  • , Pierre H. Flamant
  • Météo-France/CNRS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We question the correlation between vertical velocity (w) on the one hand and the occurrence of convective plumes in lidar reflectivity (i.e. range corrected backscatter signal Pz2) and depolarization ratio (Δ) on the other hand in the convective boundary layer (CBL). Thermal vertical motion is directly investigated using vertical velocities measured by a ground-based Doppler lidar operating at 2 μm. This lidar provides also simultaneous measurements of lidar reflectivity. In addition, a second lidar 200 m away provides reflectivities at 0.53 and 1 μm and depolarization ratio at 0.53 μm. The time series from the two lidars are analyzed in terms of linear correlation coefficient (ρ). The main result is that the plume-like structures provided by lidar reflectivity within the CBL as well as the CBL height are not a clear signature of updrafts. It is shown that the lidar reflectivity within the CBL is frequently anti-correlated (ρ (w, Pz2)) with the vertical velocity. On the contrary, the correlation coefficient between the depolarization ratio and the vertical velocity ρ (w, Δ) is always positive, showing that the depolarization ratio is a fair tracer of updrafts. The importance of relative humidity on the correlation coefficient is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)553-573
Number of pages21
JournalBoundary-Layer Meteorology
Volume125
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Keywords

  • Depolarization ratio
  • Doppler lidar
  • Lidar reflectivity
  • Thermals
  • Vertical velocities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the correlation between convective plume updrafts and downdrafts, lidar reflectivity and depolarization ratio'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this