Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On the Dependence of Cloud Feedbacks on Physical Parameterizations in WRF Aquaplanet Simulations

  • Columbia University
  • NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
  • Science Division
  • Météo-France/CNRS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate the effects of physical parameterizations on cloud feedback uncertainty in response to climate change. For this purpose, we construct an ensemble of eight aquaplanet simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. In each WRF-derived simulation, we replace only one parameterization at a time while all other parameters remain identical. By doing so, we aim to (i) reproduce cloud feedback uncertainty from state-of-the-art climate models and (ii) understand how parametrizations impact cloud feedbacks. Our results demonstrate that this ensemble of WRF simulations, which differ only in physical parameterizations, replicates the range of cloud feedback uncertainty found in state-of-the-art climate models. We show that microphysics and convective parameterizations govern the magnitude and sign of cloud feedbacks, mostly due to tropical low-level clouds in subsidence regimes. Finally, this study highlights the advantages of using WRF to analyze cloud feedback mechanisms owing to its plug-and-play parameterization capability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10,762-10,771
JournalGeophysical Research Letters
Volume44
Issue number20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • GCMs
  • WRF
  • aquaplanet
  • cloud feedbacks
  • low-level cloud
  • physical parameterizations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On the Dependence of Cloud Feedbacks on Physical Parameterizations in WRF Aquaplanet Simulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this