TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of Back Contact Grid Size in Al2O3-Rear-Passivated Ultrathin CIGS PV Cells by 2-D Simulations
AU - Lontchi, Jackson
AU - Zhukova, Maria
AU - Kovacic, Milan
AU - Krc, Janez
AU - Chen, Wei Chao
AU - Edoff, Marika
AU - Bose, Sourav
AU - Salome, Pedro M.P.
AU - Goffard, Julie
AU - Cattoni, Andrea
AU - Gouillart, L.
AU - Collin, Stephane
AU - Gusak, Viktoria
AU - Flandre, Denis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2011-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - We present a simulation strategy using ATLAS-2D to optimize the back-contact hole grid (i.e., size and pitch of openings) of the Al2O3-rear-passivation layer in ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 photovoltaic cells. We first discuss and compare our simulation model with a series of experimental nonpassivated and passivated cells to decouple the crucial passivation parameters. The simulation results follow the experimental trends, highlighting the beneficial effects of the passivation on the cell performances. Furthermore, it stresses the influence of the passivation quality at the Al2O3/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) interface and of the contact resistance at the Mo/CIGS interface within the openings. Further simulations quantify significant improvements in short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage for different sizes of openings in the Al2O3 layer, relative to an excellent passivation quality (i.e., high density of negative charges in the passivation layer). However, a degradation is predicted for a poor passivation (i.e., low density of such charges) or a high contact resistance. Consequently, we point out an optimum in efficiency when varying the opening widths at fixed hole-pitch and fixed contact resistance. At equivalent contact resistance, simulations predict that the sizes of the pitch and openings can be increased without optimal performance losses when maintaining a width to pitch ratio around 0.2. This simulation trends have been confirmed by a series of experiments, indicating that it is crucial to care about the dimensions of the opening grid and the contact resistance of passivated cells. These simulation results provide significant insights for optimal cell design and characterizations of passivated UT-CIGS PV cells.
AB - We present a simulation strategy using ATLAS-2D to optimize the back-contact hole grid (i.e., size and pitch of openings) of the Al2O3-rear-passivation layer in ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 photovoltaic cells. We first discuss and compare our simulation model with a series of experimental nonpassivated and passivated cells to decouple the crucial passivation parameters. The simulation results follow the experimental trends, highlighting the beneficial effects of the passivation on the cell performances. Furthermore, it stresses the influence of the passivation quality at the Al2O3/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) interface and of the contact resistance at the Mo/CIGS interface within the openings. Further simulations quantify significant improvements in short-circuit current and open-circuit voltage for different sizes of openings in the Al2O3 layer, relative to an excellent passivation quality (i.e., high density of negative charges in the passivation layer). However, a degradation is predicted for a poor passivation (i.e., low density of such charges) or a high contact resistance. Consequently, we point out an optimum in efficiency when varying the opening widths at fixed hole-pitch and fixed contact resistance. At equivalent contact resistance, simulations predict that the sizes of the pitch and openings can be increased without optimal performance losses when maintaining a width to pitch ratio around 0.2. This simulation trends have been confirmed by a series of experiments, indicating that it is crucial to care about the dimensions of the opening grid and the contact resistance of passivated cells. These simulation results provide significant insights for optimal cell design and characterizations of passivated UT-CIGS PV cells.
KW - 2-D modeling
KW - Al_2 O_3 passivation
KW - electrical characterization
KW - opening/pitch
KW - ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se_2 (CIGS PV) cells
U2 - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3012631
DO - 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3012631
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094848478
SN - 2156-3381
VL - 10
SP - 1908
EP - 1917
JO - IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
JF - IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics
IS - 6
M1 - 9166554
ER -