Patch similarity under non Gaussian noise

Charles Alban Deledalle, Florence Tupin, Loïc Denis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Many tasks in computer vision require to match image parts. While higher-level methods consider image features such as edges or robust descriptors, low-level approaches compare groups of pixels (patches) and provide dense matching. Patch similarity is a key ingredient to many techniques for image registration, stereo-vision, change detection or denoising. A fundamental difficulty when comparing two patches from "real" data is to decide whether the differences should be ascribed to noise or intrinsic dissimilarity. Gaussian noise assumption leads to the classical definition of patch similarity based on the squared intensity differences. When the noise departs from the Gaussian distribution, several similarity criteria have been proposed in the literature. We review seven of those criteria taken from the fields of image processing, detection theory and machine learning. We discuss their theoretical grounding and provide a numerical comparison of their performance under Gamma and Poisson noises.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICIP 2011
Subtitle of host publication2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing
Pages1845-1848
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2011 - Brussels, Belgium
Duration: 11 Sept 201114 Sept 2011

Publication series

NameProceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP
ISSN (Print)1522-4880

Conference

Conference2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2011
Country/TerritoryBelgium
CityBrussels
Period11/09/1114/09/11

Keywords

  • Bayesian approach
  • Detection
  • Likelihood ratio
  • Matching
  • Patch similarity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patch similarity under non Gaussian noise'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this