Randomized rounding in the presence of a cardinality constraint

Benjamin Doerr, Magnus Wahlström

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

We regard the problem of generating randomized roundings with a single cardinality constraint. This is motivated by recent results of Srinivasan (FOCS 2001), Gandhi et al. (FOCS 2002, J.ACM 2006) and the first author (STACS 2005, STACS 2006). Our work results in (a) an improved version of the bitwise derandomization given by the first author, (b) the first derandomization of Srinivasan's tree-based randomized approach, together with a proof of its correctness, and (c) an experimental comparison of the resulting algorithms. Our experiments show that adding a single cardinality constraint typically reduces the rounding errors and not seriously increases the running times. In general, our derandomization of the tree-based approach is superior to the derandomized bitwise one, while the two randomized versions produce very similar rounding errors. When implementing the derandomized tree-based approach, however, the choice of the tree is important.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2009 Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments, ALENEX 2009
PublisherSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Publications
Pages162-174
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)9780898719307
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event11th Annual Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments, ALENEX 2009 - New York, NY, United States
Duration: 3 Jan 20093 Jan 2009

Publication series

Name2009 Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments, ALENEX 2009

Conference

Conference11th Annual Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments, ALENEX 2009
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityNew York, NY
Period3/01/093/01/09

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized rounding in the presence of a cardinality constraint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this