Abstract
We analyze whether banking supervision responsibilities should be concentrated in the hands of a single supervisor. We find that splitting supervisory powers among different supervisors is a superior arrangement in terms of social welfare to concentrating them in a single supervisor when the capture of supervisors by bankers is a concern. This result has implications for the design of banking supervisory architecture and informs current reform efforts in this field.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 206-217 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Financial Stability |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Banking supervision reform
- Financial supervision architecture
- Prudential supervision
- Regulatory capture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Regulatory capture and banking supervision reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver