Abstract
In the preceding comment [A. Albrecht et al., Phys. Rev. E 94, 067001 (2016)10.1103/PhysRevE.94.067001], Albrecht et al. argue that important biomechanical ingredients are missing in our model about the wind speed at which trees break [Phys. Rev. E 93, 023001 (2016)10.1103/PhysRevE.93.023001]. Here we wish to emphasize that our model is an idealization, which primarily aims at evidencing the dominant ingredients of the problem. Since it captures both observed trends and orders of magnitude, we believe that the essential parameters in tree breakage have been identified, a useful step to make further progress and more detailed descriptions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 067002 |
| Journal | Physical Review E |
| Volume | 94 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Dec 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to "comment on 'Critical wind speed at which trees break' "'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver