Reply to Comment on "generation of 1011 contrast 50 TW laser pulses"

V. Chvykov; P. Rousseau; S. Reed; G. Kalinchenko; V. Yanovsky

doi:10.1364/OL.31.002993

Reply to Comment on "generation of 10¹¹ contrast 50 TW laser pulses"

V. Chvykov
, P. Rousseau
, S. Reed
, G. Kalinchenko
, V. Yanovsky

University of Michigan

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We show that the Comment of Albert et al. [Opt. Lett. 31, 2990 (2006)], although being only marginally relevant to the content of the original paper [Opt. Lett. 31, 1456 (2006)], misinterprets our results and leads to a wrong conclusion: that the rotation of the second crystal in the double-crystal scheme is unimportant. On the contrary, it follows from the Comment itself as well as from our experiment that the crystal rotation is the main factor in improving the efficiency.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2993-2994
Number of pages	2
Journal	Optics Letters
Volume	31
Issue number	20
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.002993
Publication status	Published - 15 Oct 2006
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1364/OL.31.002993

Cite this

@article{55a174d9e28c4cf48f4ce04086bc028e,

title = "Reply to Comment on {"}generation of 1011 contrast 50 TW laser pulses{"}",

abstract = "We show that the Comment of Albert et al. [Opt. Lett. 31, 2990 (2006)], although being only marginally relevant to the content of the original paper [Opt. Lett. 31, 1456 (2006)], misinterprets our results and leads to a wrong conclusion: that the rotation of the second crystal in the double-crystal scheme is unimportant. On the contrary, it follows from the Comment itself as well as from our experiment that the crystal rotation is the main factor in improving the efficiency.",

author = "V. Chvykov and P. Rousseau and S. Reed and G. Kalinchenko and V. Yanovsky",

year = "2006",

month = oct,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1364/OL.31.002993",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "2993--2994",

journal = "Optics Letters",

issn = "0146-9592",

publisher = "Optica Publishing Group (formerly OSA)",

number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Comment on "generation of 1011 contrast 50 TW laser pulses"

AU - Chvykov, V.

AU - Rousseau, P.

AU - Reed, S.

AU - Kalinchenko, G.

AU - Yanovsky, V.

PY - 2006/10/15

Y1 - 2006/10/15

N2 - We show that the Comment of Albert et al. [Opt. Lett. 31, 2990 (2006)], although being only marginally relevant to the content of the original paper [Opt. Lett. 31, 1456 (2006)], misinterprets our results and leads to a wrong conclusion: that the rotation of the second crystal in the double-crystal scheme is unimportant. On the contrary, it follows from the Comment itself as well as from our experiment that the crystal rotation is the main factor in improving the efficiency.

AB - We show that the Comment of Albert et al. [Opt. Lett. 31, 2990 (2006)], although being only marginally relevant to the content of the original paper [Opt. Lett. 31, 1456 (2006)], misinterprets our results and leads to a wrong conclusion: that the rotation of the second crystal in the double-crystal scheme is unimportant. On the contrary, it follows from the Comment itself as well as from our experiment that the crystal rotation is the main factor in improving the efficiency.

U2 - 10.1364/OL.31.002993

DO - 10.1364/OL.31.002993

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33750524643

SN - 0146-9592

VL - 31

SP - 2993

EP - 2994

JO - Optics Letters

JF - Optics Letters

IS - 20

ER -

Reply to Comment on "generation of 1011 contrast 50 TW laser pulses"

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this

Reply to Comment on "generation of 10¹¹ contrast 50 TW laser pulses"