TY - JOUR
T1 - Resolvent analysis of swirling turbulent jets
AU - Chevalier, Quentin
AU - Douglas, Christopher M.
AU - Lesshafft, Lutz
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024.
PY - 2024/10/1
Y1 - 2024/10/1
N2 - Abstract: This study explores coherent structures in a swirling turbulent jet. Stationary axisymmetric solutions of the Reynolds–Averaged Navier–Stokes equations at Re=200,000 were obtained using an open source computational fluid dynamics code and the Spalart–Allmaras eddy viscosity model. Then, resolvent analysis with the same eddy viscosity field provided coherent structures of the turbulent fluctuations on the base flow. As in many earlier studies, a large gain separation is identified between the optimal and sub-optimal resolvent modes, permitting a focus on the most amplified response mode and its corresponding optimal forcing. At zero swirl, the results indicate that the jet’s coherent response is dominated by axisymmetric (m=0) structures, which are driven by the usual Kelvin–Helmholtz shear amplification mechanism. However, as swirl is increased, different coherent structures begin to dominate the response. For example, double and triple spiral (|m|=2 and |m|=3) modes are identified as the dominant structures when the axial and azimuthal velocity maxima of the base flow are comparable. In this case, distinct co- and counter-rotating |m|=2 modes experience vastly different degrees of amplification. The physics of this selection process involve several amplification mechanisms contributing simultaneously in different regions of the mode. This is analysed in more detail by comparing the alignment between the wavevector of the dominant response mode and the principal shear direction of the base flow. Additional discussion also considers the development of structures along the exterior of the jet nozzle. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
AB - Abstract: This study explores coherent structures in a swirling turbulent jet. Stationary axisymmetric solutions of the Reynolds–Averaged Navier–Stokes equations at Re=200,000 were obtained using an open source computational fluid dynamics code and the Spalart–Allmaras eddy viscosity model. Then, resolvent analysis with the same eddy viscosity field provided coherent structures of the turbulent fluctuations on the base flow. As in many earlier studies, a large gain separation is identified between the optimal and sub-optimal resolvent modes, permitting a focus on the most amplified response mode and its corresponding optimal forcing. At zero swirl, the results indicate that the jet’s coherent response is dominated by axisymmetric (m=0) structures, which are driven by the usual Kelvin–Helmholtz shear amplification mechanism. However, as swirl is increased, different coherent structures begin to dominate the response. For example, double and triple spiral (|m|=2 and |m|=3) modes are identified as the dominant structures when the axial and azimuthal velocity maxima of the base flow are comparable. In this case, distinct co- and counter-rotating |m|=2 modes experience vastly different degrees of amplification. The physics of this selection process involve several amplification mechanisms contributing simultaneously in different regions of the mode. This is analysed in more detail by comparing the alignment between the wavevector of the dominant response mode and the principal shear direction of the base flow. Additional discussion also considers the development of structures along the exterior of the jet nozzle. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
KW - Jets
KW - Resolvent analysis
KW - Rotating flows
KW - Turbulence
U2 - 10.1007/s00162-024-00704-2
DO - 10.1007/s00162-024-00704-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85195842998
SN - 0935-4964
VL - 38
SP - 641
EP - 663
JO - Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics
JF - Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics
IS - 5
ER -