Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Response to Comment on "revised paleoaltimetry data show low Tibetan Plateau elevation during the Eocene"

  • Svetlana Botsyun
  • , Pierre Sepulchre
  • , Yannick Donnadieu
  • , Camille Risi
  • , Alexis Licht
  • , Jeremy K.Caves Rugenstein
  • Université Versailles-Saint Quentin
  • University of Tübingen
  • Aix Marseille Université
  • University of Washington
  • Max Planck Institute for Meteorology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Valdes et al. contest our results, suggesting failings in our modeling approach as well as in our comparison with data. Although their comment points to interesting ideas of improvement, we find that their critique reflects an incomplete understanding of our methods and is not supported by the material they provide.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbereaax8990
JournalScience
Volume365
Issue number6459
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sept 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Comment on "revised paleoaltimetry data show low Tibetan Plateau elevation during the Eocene"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this