Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Satisficing Versus Optimality: Criteria for Sustainability

  • UR1303 ALISS Alimentation et Sciences Sociales
  • Univ. Bordeaux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Economic analysis addresses risk and long-term issues with discounted expected utility, focusing on optimality. Viability theory is rooted on satisfying sustainability constraints over time, focusing on feasibility. We build a bridge between these two approaches by establishing that viability is equivalent to an array of degenerate intertemporal optimization problems. First, we focus our attention on the deterministic case. We highlight the connections between the viability kernel and the minimum time of crisis. Carrying on, we lay out stochastic viability, turning the spotlight onto the notions of viable scenario and maximal viability probability. Our conceptual results bring the viability approach closer to the economic approach, especially in the stochastic case and regarding efficiency. We discuss the possible use of viability as a theoretical framework for biodiversity conservation, ecosystem management and climate change issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-297
Number of pages17
JournalBulletin of Mathematical Biology
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Optimality
  • Sustainability
  • Uncertainty
  • Viability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Satisficing Versus Optimality: Criteria for Sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this