TY - GEN
T1 - Self-adjusting mutation rates with provably optimal success rules
AU - Doerr, Benjamin
AU - Doerr, Carola
AU - Lengler, Johannes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to the Association for Computing Machinery.
PY - 2019/7/13
Y1 - 2019/7/13
N2 - The one-fifth success rule is one of the best-known and most widely accepted techniques to control the parameters of evolutionary algorithms. While it is often applied in the literal sense, a common interpretation sees the one-fifth success rule as a family of success-based updated rules that are determined by an update strength F and a success rate s. We analyze in this work how the performance of the (1+1) Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) on LeadingOnes depends on these two hyper-parameters. Our main result shows that the best performance is obtained for small update strengths F = 1+o(1) and success rate 1/e. We also prove that the runtime obtained by this parameter setting is asymptotically optimal among all dynamic choices of the mutation rate for the (1+1) EA, up to lower order error terms. We show similar results for the resampling variant of the (1+1) EA, which enforces to flip at least one bit per iteration.
AB - The one-fifth success rule is one of the best-known and most widely accepted techniques to control the parameters of evolutionary algorithms. While it is often applied in the literal sense, a common interpretation sees the one-fifth success rule as a family of success-based updated rules that are determined by an update strength F and a success rate s. We analyze in this work how the performance of the (1+1) Evolutionary Algorithm (EA) on LeadingOnes depends on these two hyper-parameters. Our main result shows that the best performance is obtained for small update strengths F = 1+o(1) and success rate 1/e. We also prove that the runtime obtained by this parameter setting is asymptotically optimal among all dynamic choices of the mutation rate for the (1+1) EA, up to lower order error terms. We show similar results for the resampling variant of the (1+1) EA, which enforces to flip at least one bit per iteration.
U2 - 10.1145/3321707.3321733
DO - 10.1145/3321707.3321733
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85070633063
T3 - GECCO 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
SP - 1479
EP - 1487
BT - GECCO 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
T2 - 2019 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2019
Y2 - 13 July 2019 through 17 July 2019
ER -