Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Source geometric considerations for OMEGA Dante measurements

  • M. J. May
  • , J. R. Patterson
  • , C. Sorce
  • , K. Widmann
  • , K. B. Fournier
  • , F. Perez
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
  • University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Dante is a 15 channel filtered diode array which is installed on the OMEGA laser facility at the Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester. The system yields the spectrally and temporally resolved radiation flux from 50 eV to 10 keV from various targets (i.e., Hohlraum, gas pipes, etc.). The absolute flux is determined from the radiometric calibration of the x-ray diodes, filters, and mirrors and an unfold algorithm applied to the recorded voltages from each channel. The unfold algorithm assumes an emitting source that is spatially uniform and has a constant area as a function of photon energy. The emitting x-ray source is usually considered to be the laser entrance hole (LEH) of a given diameter for Hohlraum type targets or the effective wall area of high conversion efficiency K-shell type targets. This assumption can be problematic for several reasons. High intensity regions or hot spots in the x-ray are observed where the drive laser beams strike the target. The hot spots create non-uniform emission seen by the Dante. Additionally, thinned walled (50 μm) low-Z targets (C 22H 10N 2O 5) have an energy dependent source size since the targets walls will be fully opaque for low energies (E <2-3 keV) yet fully transmissive at higher energies. Determining accurate yields can be challenging for these types of targets. Discussion and some analysis will be presented.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10E117
JournalReview of Scientific Instruments
Volume83
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Source geometric considerations for OMEGA Dante measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this