Abstract
We revisit the step bunching instability without recourse to the quasistatic approximation and show that the stability diagrams are significantly altered, even in the low-deposition regime where it was thought sufficient. In particular, steps are unstable against bunching for attachment-detachment limited growth. By accounting for the dynamics and chemical effects, we can explain the onset of step bunching in Si(111)-(7×7) and GaAs(001) without resort to the inverse Schwoebel barrier or step-edge diffusion. Further, the size-scaling analysis of step-bunch growth, as induced by these two combined effects, agrees with the bunching regime observed at 750 °C in Si(111)-(7×7).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 036101 |
| Journal | Physical Review Letters |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Jan 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stability of Vicinal Surfaces: Beyond the Quasistatic Approximation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver