TY - JOUR
T1 - Subjective social status and allostatic load among older people in England
T2 - A longitudinal analysis
AU - Richards, Lindsay
AU - Maharani, Asri
AU - Präg, Patrick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Background: Subjective social status has a known association with health, whereby better health outcomes are observed for those with higher perceived status. In this research, we offer new evidence on the status–health relationship using a rigorous methodological approach that considers both observed and unobserved confounders. Methods: We use 5 waves of data spanning 15 years from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and derive a measure of allostatic load with biomarkers as an objective measure of health. We apply ‘within–between’ panel regression models. Results: Models reveal the expected association between subjective status and health when comparing participants (the ‘between’ estimate), but no association when examining temporal variation within participants (the ‘within’ estimate). When controlling for personality traits including optimism, and parental education, the ‘between’ association between subjective status and allostatic load is reduced but does not disappear. Conclusions: Person-level confounders play some role in explaining the observed link between subjective status and health. The exact nature of the link, including the role of psychological pathways and early-life confounders, remains a question for future research.
AB - Background: Subjective social status has a known association with health, whereby better health outcomes are observed for those with higher perceived status. In this research, we offer new evidence on the status–health relationship using a rigorous methodological approach that considers both observed and unobserved confounders. Methods: We use 5 waves of data spanning 15 years from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and derive a measure of allostatic load with biomarkers as an objective measure of health. We apply ‘within–between’ panel regression models. Results: Models reveal the expected association between subjective status and health when comparing participants (the ‘between’ estimate), but no association when examining temporal variation within participants (the ‘within’ estimate). When controlling for personality traits including optimism, and parental education, the ‘between’ association between subjective status and allostatic load is reduced but does not disappear. Conclusions: Person-level confounders play some role in explaining the observed link between subjective status and health. The exact nature of the link, including the role of psychological pathways and early-life confounders, remains a question for future research.
KW - Allostatic load
KW - ELSA
KW - Health
KW - Subjective social status
KW - Within-between models
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115749
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115749
M3 - Article
C2 - 36738654
AN - SCOPUS:85148773528
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 320
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
M1 - 115749
ER -