Sustainable system-of-systems and francophone activity-centered approaches in ergonomics: Converging and diverging lines of dialogue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper initiates a dialogue between the sustainable system-of-systems (SSoS) approach and one particular situated approach of activity analysis within francophone activity-centered ergonomics (FACE). This paper explores the possible cross-fertilizations between FACE and SSoS in coping with the challenge of enlargement which ergonomists have to face in order to address sustainability issues. We present how the SSoS model and FACE have currently considered the challenges of sustainable development and the theoretical-methodological principles that frame their approaches. Then, eight topics of dialogue are introduced and debated in order to open the dialogue between the two approaches where emerging lines of convergence are generated. We conclude by further discussing the complementarity between FACE and SSoS in the objectives of their approaches and the levels analysed by each approach, and by highlighting the importance of taking into account the emergent and complex aspects of systems. One possible way forward might be to “situate the sustainable system-of-systems” while also “systemizing systems of sustainable situations” for the future.

Translated title of the contributionSystème de systèmes durables et approches francophones centrées sur l'activité en ergonomie: convergences et divergences de lignes de dialogues
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-177
Number of pages19
JournalPsychologie Francaise
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Activity-centered ergonomics
  • Development
  • Human-machine-environment interaction
  • Lived experience
  • Sustainable system-of-systems
  • Transition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sustainable system-of-systems and francophone activity-centered approaches in ergonomics: Converging and diverging lines of dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this