TY - JOUR
T1 - Symptom-to-needle times in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
T2 - Shortest route to a primary coronary intervention facility
AU - Leleu, Henri
AU - Capuano, Frédéric
AU - Ferrua, Marie
AU - Nitenberg, Gérard
AU - Minvielle, Etienne
AU - Schiele, François
PY - 2013/3/1
Y1 - 2013/3/1
N2 - Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred management for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) if performed in a timely manner by experienced providers. Patients can access a PCI facility by three routes: prehospital STEMI diagnosis by emergency medical services (EMS) and direct transport by EMS to a PCI facility (EMS-PCI); visit to a hospital emergency department (ED) followed by referral to an on-site PCI facility (ED-PCI); or transfer from the ED to a PCI facility in another hospital (ED-transfer-PCI). Aims: To assess the implementation rate in France of the guidelines recommending that STEMI patients be transported by EMS to a PCI facility and to compare the times between symptom onset and PCI for these three routes. Methods: We used the results of the pilot testing of a national quality indicator programme on STEMI in 64 hospitals, providing data on patient characteristics, referral route and symptom-onset-to-needle time. We compared delays for each route in a Cox proportional-hazard model. Results: In a population of 1217 patients, median symptom-onset-to-needle time was 186 minutes (Q1 133; Q3 292) for the EMS-PCI route, 237 minutes (Q1 165; Q3 368) for the ED-PCI route and 305 minutes (Q1 230; Q3 570) for the ED-transfer-PCI route. A total of 70.8% of patients were transported by EMS as recommended. After adjustment for age, symptom onset period (weekends/nights) and history of cardiovascular disease, the EMS-PCI route was associated with the shortest symptom-onset-to-needle times. The hazard ratio was 0.71 [0.59-0.86] for the ED-PCI route and 0.67 [0.52-0.86] for the ED-transfer-PCI route. Conclusion: STEMI patients receive prompter care after prehospital diagnosis and direct transport to a PCI facility by EMS than by visiting a hospital ED. Use of this referral route should be further encouraged in France as approximately one-third of STEMI patients are still presenting directly to the ED.
AB - Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred management for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) if performed in a timely manner by experienced providers. Patients can access a PCI facility by three routes: prehospital STEMI diagnosis by emergency medical services (EMS) and direct transport by EMS to a PCI facility (EMS-PCI); visit to a hospital emergency department (ED) followed by referral to an on-site PCI facility (ED-PCI); or transfer from the ED to a PCI facility in another hospital (ED-transfer-PCI). Aims: To assess the implementation rate in France of the guidelines recommending that STEMI patients be transported by EMS to a PCI facility and to compare the times between symptom onset and PCI for these three routes. Methods: We used the results of the pilot testing of a national quality indicator programme on STEMI in 64 hospitals, providing data on patient characteristics, referral route and symptom-onset-to-needle time. We compared delays for each route in a Cox proportional-hazard model. Results: In a population of 1217 patients, median symptom-onset-to-needle time was 186 minutes (Q1 133; Q3 292) for the EMS-PCI route, 237 minutes (Q1 165; Q3 368) for the ED-PCI route and 305 minutes (Q1 230; Q3 570) for the ED-transfer-PCI route. A total of 70.8% of patients were transported by EMS as recommended. After adjustment for age, symptom onset period (weekends/nights) and history of cardiovascular disease, the EMS-PCI route was associated with the shortest symptom-onset-to-needle times. The hazard ratio was 0.71 [0.59-0.86] for the ED-PCI route and 0.67 [0.52-0.86] for the ED-transfer-PCI route. Conclusion: STEMI patients receive prompter care after prehospital diagnosis and direct transport to a PCI facility by EMS than by visiting a hospital ED. Use of this referral route should be further encouraged in France as approximately one-third of STEMI patients are still presenting directly to the ED.
KW - Acute myocardial infarct
KW - Emergency ambulance systems
KW - Prehospital care
KW - Triage
U2 - 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.12.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 23582678
AN - SCOPUS:84876284273
SN - 1875-2136
VL - 106
SP - 162
EP - 168
JO - Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
JF - Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
IS - 3
ER -