Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Taking off into the wind: Unemployment risk and state-Dependent government spending multipliers

  • Université Lumière Lyon II
  • Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale
  • CIREQ
  • Institut Universitaire de France

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a model with involuntary unemployment, incomplete markets, and nominal rigidity, in which the effects of government spending are state-dependent. An increase in government purchases raises aggregate demand, tightens the labor market and reduces unemployment. This in turn lowers unemployment risk and thus precautionary saving, leading to a larger response of private consumption than in a model with perfect insurance. The output multiplier is further amplified through a composition effect, as the fraction of high-consumption households in total population increases in response to the spending shock. These features, along with the matching frictions in the labor market, generate significantly larger multipliers in recessions than in expansions. As the pool of job seekers is larger during downturns than during expansions, the concavity of the job-finding probability with respect to market tightness implies that an increase in government spending reduces unemployment risk more in the former case than in the latter, giving rise to countercyclical multipliers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)990-1007
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Monetary Economics
Volume117
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • Government spending
  • Multipliers
  • Precautionary saving
  • State dependence
  • Unemployment risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Taking off into the wind: Unemployment risk and state-Dependent government spending multipliers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this