TY - JOUR
T1 - The atmospheric boundary-layer structure within a cold air outbreak
T2 - Comparison of in situ, lidar and satellite measurements with three-dimensional simulations
AU - Flamant, Cyrille
AU - Georgelin, Marc
AU - Menut, Laurent
AU - Pelon, Jacques
AU - Bougeault, Philippe
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - A cold-air outbreak over the Mediterranean, associated with a Tramontane event, has been simulated with the atmospheric non-hydrostatic model Meso-NH using a horizontal resolution of 2 km. Results are compared with in situ aircraft, airborne lidar and satellite measurements. On average, the mean and turbulent parameters simulated in the surface layer and mixed layer compared well with in situ measurements. The model was able to reproduce accurately the Foehn effect in the wake of Cape Creus, as well as the occurence of rolls in the coastal region in connection with cloud streets observed with AVHRR. Over the sea, the threshold value of turbulent kinetic energy defining the height of the atmospheric boundary-layer top in the model (defined as 25% of the maximum turbulent kinetic energy in the profile) enables the simulated atmospheric boundary-layer height to match the one retrieved from lidar measurements. Nevertheless, the model did not handle very well the abrupt gradients of all meteorological parameters observed at the top of the atmospheric boundary-layer. Reasons for this are investigated.
AB - A cold-air outbreak over the Mediterranean, associated with a Tramontane event, has been simulated with the atmospheric non-hydrostatic model Meso-NH using a horizontal resolution of 2 km. Results are compared with in situ aircraft, airborne lidar and satellite measurements. On average, the mean and turbulent parameters simulated in the surface layer and mixed layer compared well with in situ measurements. The model was able to reproduce accurately the Foehn effect in the wake of Cape Creus, as well as the occurence of rolls in the coastal region in connection with cloud streets observed with AVHRR. Over the sea, the threshold value of turbulent kinetic energy defining the height of the atmospheric boundary-layer top in the model (defined as 25% of the maximum turbulent kinetic energy in the profile) enables the simulated atmospheric boundary-layer height to match the one retrieved from lidar measurements. Nevertheless, the model did not handle very well the abrupt gradients of all meteorological parameters observed at the top of the atmospheric boundary-layer. Reasons for this are investigated.
KW - Airborne lidar
KW - Boundary-layer structure
KW - Cold-air outbreak
KW - Mesoscale numerical modelling
KW - Rolls
KW - Satellite
U2 - 10.1023/A:1018722923349
DO - 10.1023/A:1018722923349
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035313033
SN - 0006-8314
VL - 99
SP - 85
EP - 103
JO - Boundary-Layer Meteorology
JF - Boundary-Layer Meteorology
IS - 1
M1 - 279762
ER -