TY - JOUR
T1 - The Motivations and Practices of Impact Assessment in Socially Responsible Investing
T2 - The French Case and its Implications for the Accounting and Impact Investing Communities
AU - Arjaliès, Diane Laure
AU - Chollet, Pierre
AU - Crifo, Patricia
AU - Mottis, Nicolas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - This research note elaborates on the impact assessment practices of the French Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) industry. The research was conducted by the Scientific Committee of the French public SRI label based on interviews, participative observation, a survey, and documentary evidence. SRI is usually distinguished from impact investing in terms of investors’ different intentions (contributing to sustainable development in a financially savvy way for SRI vs. demonstrating a societal impact for impact investing). We show that, beyond this distinction, the meanings and motivations behind impact assessment in the SRI community are broadly different from impact assessment practices in impact investing, creating a distance between the two communities. In fact, little is known about impact assessment practices in SRI, despite the market power of this asset class. We address this shortcoming by investigating 1) who is interested in impact assessment in the SRI industry, 2) why SRI investors want impact assessment, and 3) what impact assessment looks like in the SRI industry. We develop this analysis to suggest areas of concern and opportunities for the SRI, impact investing, and accounting communities. SRI investors’ recent appropriation of impact assessment indicates that the three communities’ interests and success will increasingly be linked to one another. The topic therefore warrants investigation.
AB - This research note elaborates on the impact assessment practices of the French Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) industry. The research was conducted by the Scientific Committee of the French public SRI label based on interviews, participative observation, a survey, and documentary evidence. SRI is usually distinguished from impact investing in terms of investors’ different intentions (contributing to sustainable development in a financially savvy way for SRI vs. demonstrating a societal impact for impact investing). We show that, beyond this distinction, the meanings and motivations behind impact assessment in the SRI community are broadly different from impact assessment practices in impact investing, creating a distance between the two communities. In fact, little is known about impact assessment practices in SRI, despite the market power of this asset class. We address this shortcoming by investigating 1) who is interested in impact assessment in the SRI industry, 2) why SRI investors want impact assessment, and 3) what impact assessment looks like in the SRI industry. We develop this analysis to suggest areas of concern and opportunities for the SRI, impact investing, and accounting communities. SRI investors’ recent appropriation of impact assessment indicates that the three communities’ interests and success will increasingly be linked to one another. The topic therefore warrants investigation.
KW - ESG criteria
KW - France
KW - Impact assessment
KW - impact investing
KW - socially responsible investing
U2 - 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2032239
DO - 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2032239
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124203829
SN - 0969-160X
VL - 43
SP - 1
EP - 29
JO - Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
JF - Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
IS - 1
ER -