TY - JOUR
T1 - The open innovation paradigm
T2 - From outsourcing to open-sourcing in Shenzhen, China
AU - Fernandez, Valérie
AU - Puel, Gilles
AU - Renaud, Clément
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© SPSD Press from 2010, SPSD Press, Kanazawa.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Having once been the headquarters of 'Made in China,' Shenzhen's industry is currently undergoing profound change. The appearance of new urban places for technological innovation is reviving the ageing industrial processes of this manufacturing city. It is supposed to transform Shenzhen into the Silicon Valley of hardware. Two groups, one local, the shanzhai community made up of entrepreneurs and companies historically based on a strategy of imitating high-end products, and the other, a more international maker community, are thought to be the main drivers of this change using values of 'open innovation'. The building of this ecosystem relies largely on practices associated with being open-source. Like in California, open innovation contributed to the creation of resources for the development of a vast high-tech industry. This ethnographic field study shows how, while both communities, the international makers and the shanzhai, draw on open innovation, they do not have the same values. For the shanzhai, open innovation means total deregulation and a kind of coopetition that poorly masks fierce competition. For the makers, open innovation does not entirely eliminate the classic tension between 'open' and 'closed' commons in the world of makers. These two communities still rarely collaborate.
AB - Having once been the headquarters of 'Made in China,' Shenzhen's industry is currently undergoing profound change. The appearance of new urban places for technological innovation is reviving the ageing industrial processes of this manufacturing city. It is supposed to transform Shenzhen into the Silicon Valley of hardware. Two groups, one local, the shanzhai community made up of entrepreneurs and companies historically based on a strategy of imitating high-end products, and the other, a more international maker community, are thought to be the main drivers of this change using values of 'open innovation'. The building of this ecosystem relies largely on practices associated with being open-source. Like in California, open innovation contributed to the creation of resources for the development of a vast high-tech industry. This ethnographic field study shows how, while both communities, the international makers and the shanzhai, draw on open innovation, they do not have the same values. For the shanzhai, open innovation means total deregulation and a kind of coopetition that poorly masks fierce competition. For the makers, open innovation does not entirely eliminate the classic tension between 'open' and 'closed' commons in the world of makers. These two communities still rarely collaborate.
KW - Makers
KW - New urban places
KW - Open innovation
KW - Shanzhai
KW - Shenzhen
U2 - 10.14246/irspsd.4.4_27
DO - 10.14246/irspsd.4.4_27
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84992734325
SN - 2187-3666
VL - 4
SP - 27
EP - 41
JO - International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development
JF - International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development
IS - 4
ER -