Abstract
Some start-ups treat regulatory constraints as exogenous and beyond their control, while other start-ups treat regulatory constraints as endogenous and possible to influence. However, thus far, no explanation has been offered for why start-ups differ in their responses to regulatory constraints. Based on 49 interviews with start-ups and other industry actors this paper examines start-ups’ responses to regulatory constraints in the market for drone applications. We find that variation in start-ups’ responses is instigated by start-ups’ temporal orientation. Start-ups pursuing applications targeted at present markets or future potential markets treat regulation as exogenous. In contrast, start-ups that pursue market applications bridging current and future potential markets are more likely to treat regulation as endogenous.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 104055 |
| Journal | Research Policy |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- M13 new firms
- Sectorial Planning Methods
- Start-ups, l22 firm organization and market structure, l52 industrial policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The strategic responses of start-ups to regulatory constraints in the nascent drone market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver