Thermal stability of amorphous Zn-In-Sn-O films

  • Diana E. Proffit
  • , Thomas Philippe
  • , Jonathan D. Emery
  • , Qing Ma
  • , Bruce D. Buchholz
  • , Peter W. Voorhees
  • , Michael J. Bedzyk
  • , Robert P.H. Chang
  • , Thomas O. Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Isochronal annealing of amorphous Zn and Sn codoped In2O3 (a-ZITO) films was performed at the Synchrotron so that to extract, in situ, important kinetic nucleation and growth parameters from a single constant-rate heating experiment. First, amorphous Zn and Sn codoped In2O3 films were deposited via pulsed laser deposition and subjected to post-deposition annealing treatments to study their stability against crystallization. Crystallization on glass and ĉ-sapphire occurred near the same temperature, however higher codoping levels resulted in increased crystallization temperatures. Post-deposition anneal crystallization temperatures were found to be higher than the substrate temperatures required to grow crystalline films during deposition. Then, a-ZITO films were subjected to a constant temperature ramp during in situ grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction experiments. Crystallization of films on both glass and ĉ-sapphire showed similar gradual crystallization behavior between 300 and 345 °C and strong (111) texturing, which suggests the influence of surface energy minimization during crystallization. The activation energy was found to be 2.87 eV using Johnson-Mehl-Avrami analysis. This work presents the advantages of in situ experiments to study nucleation and growth during crystallization of transparent conducting oxides.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-174
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Electroceramics
Volume34
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Amorphous
  • Crystallization
  • Transparent conducting oxides
  • Zn-In-Sn-O

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thermal stability of amorphous Zn-In-Sn-O films'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this