Abstract
Bridging the social networks, field methods and ethics literatures, I make the case that the process of reporting research findings is an ethical issue, and recommend elevating it in the research design. I draw on a reflective account of three research experiences with settings in, respectively, online health communities, economic organizations, and the mainstream media. I proceed in steps, discussing release of personal network results to individual participants, of whole network results to the researched community, and finally of general results to wider audiences, under a unifying idea that a reciprocity obligation underlies the reporting process. I claim that communication should follow an iterative rather than a linear approach to reach all relevant stakeholders, thereby mitigating the vulnerabilities that arise from research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 65-73 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Social Networks |
| Volume | 67 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2021 |
Keywords
- Communication outside academia
- Network visualization
- Reciprocity
- Reporting results to study participants
- Research ethics
- Social network research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Whose results are these anyway? Reciprocity and the ethics of “giving back” after social network research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver