Worker-firm matching and the parenthood pay gap: Evidence from linked employer-employee data

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The parenthood pay gap is not fully explained by human capital depreciation and unobserved heterogeneity. Endogenous worker-firm matching could also account for such wage differences. This hypothesis is tested thanks to linked employer-employee data on the French private sector between 1995 and 2011. Childbirth penalties are estimated for women and for men from hourly wage equations including firm- and worker-fixed effects on top of usual measures of human capital. Though worker-firm matching explains none of the motherhood wage penalty, it plays a role in the case of fathers who do not experience any wage loss after childbirth, but do not enjoy any premium either; there is evidence of an erosion of this premium since the end of the 1990s. In a counterfactual where women do not incur any penalty after childbirth, the gender gap still amounts to 2/3 of the one that currently prevails.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)991-1023
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Population Economics
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Keywords

  • Gender inequalities
  • High dimensional fixed effects
  • Linked employer-employee data
  • Parenthood pay gap
  • Worker-firm matching

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Worker-firm matching and the parenthood pay gap: Evidence from linked employer-employee data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this