Abstract
The parenthood pay gap is not fully explained by human capital depreciation and unobserved heterogeneity. Endogenous worker-firm matching could also account for such wage differences. This hypothesis is tested thanks to linked employer-employee data on the French private sector between 1995 and 2011. Childbirth penalties are estimated for women and for men from hourly wage equations including firm- and worker-fixed effects on top of usual measures of human capital. Though worker-firm matching explains none of the motherhood wage penalty, it plays a role in the case of fathers who do not experience any wage loss after childbirth, but do not enjoy any premium either; there is evidence of an erosion of this premium since the end of the 1990s. In a counterfactual where women do not incur any penalty after childbirth, the gender gap still amounts to 2/3 of the one that currently prevails.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 991-1023 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Journal of Population Economics |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Keywords
- Gender inequalities
- High dimensional fixed effects
- Linked employer-employee data
- Parenthood pay gap
- Worker-firm matching
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Worker-firm matching and the parenthood pay gap: Evidence from linked employer-employee data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver