Résumé
We state corrections to the proofs of Proposition 4.2 and Proposition 6.2, which were correct in the original submitted version; see Barrett & Boyaval (2017). The proofs are correct as stated, except we replace = by "≤" in the definitions of Bγ and Bhγ, and we do not appeal to Proposition 2.8 in Zeidler (1986), due to the choice of test functions. To correct the latter, we make the following additions. Proof of Proposition 4.2. On assuming, for any γ ℝ >0, that the continuous mapping has no zero in Bγ, we define the continuous mapping Gγ : Bγ → Bγ such that (Formula Presented) By the Brouwer fixed point theorem Gγ has at least one fixed point (w,ψ) in Bγ, and so (Formula Presented) On the other hand, as (w,ψ) is a fixed point of Gγ, we have that (Formula Presented) It follows from (3.6), (3.7b), (3.5) and similarly to (4.29), on noting (4.28) and (1), that (Formula Presented) Therefore, on combining (2) and (3), we have for all γ sufficiently large that (Formula Presented) which obviously contradicts (4.30). Hence the mapping has a zero in Bγ for γ sufficiently large, and so there exists a solution (unδ,h σnδ,h) to (4.13a,b). Proof of Proposition 6.2. On assuming, for any γ ϵ ℝ>0, that the continuous mapping h has no zero in Bhγ, we define the continuous mapping Ghγ : Bhγ → Bhγ such that (Formula Presented) By the Brouwer fixed point theorem Ghγ has at least one fixed point (w, ψ, ξ) in Bhγ, and so (Formula Presented) On the other hand, as (w, ψ, ξ) is a fixed point of Ghγ, we have that (Formula Presented) It follows from (6.40), (3.5), (3.7b), and similarly to (6.42), on noting (6.41) and (4), that (Formula presented) Therefore on combining (5) and (6), we have for all γ sufficiently large that (Formula Presented) which obviously contradicts (6.43). Hence the mapping h has a zero in Bhγ for γ sufficiently large, and so there exists a solution (unα,δ,h, σnα,δ,h,Qnα,δ,h) to (6.34a-c). The authors apologise for these errors.
| langue originale | Anglais |
|---|---|
| Pages (de - à) | 2166-2168 |
| Nombre de pages | 3 |
| journal | IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis |
| Volume | 38 |
| Numéro de publication | 4 |
| Les DOIs |
|
| état | Publié - 16 oct. 2018 |
Empreinte digitale
Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Corrigendum to: Finite element approximation of the FENE-P model (IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis (2017) DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drx061) ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.Contient cette citation
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver