Passer à la navigation principale Passer à la recherche Passer au contenu principal

Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age

  • Laura Robinson
  • , Jeremy Schulz
  • , Grant Blank
  • , Massimo Ragnedda
  • , Hiroshi Ono
  • , Bernie Hogan
  • , Gustavo Mesch
  • , Shelia R. Cotton
  • , Susan B. Kretchmer
  • , Timothy M. Hale
  • , Tomasz Drabowicz
  • , Pu Yan
  • , Barry Wellman
  • , Molly Gloria Harper
  • , Anabel Quan-Haase
  • , Hopeton S. Dunn
  • , Antonio A. Casilli
  • , Paola Tubaro
  • , Rod Carveth
  • , Wenhong Chen
  • Julie B. Wiest, Matías Dodel, Michael J. Stern, Christopher Ball, Kuo Ting Huang, Aneka Khilnani
  • Santa Clara University
  • UC Berkeley Institute
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Oxford University and Nuffield College
  • Northumbria University
  • Texas A&M University
  • Department of Sociology
  • University of Haifa
  • Michigan State University
  • Clemson University
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • University of Lodz
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Western Ontario
  • University of Botswana
  • University of Johannesburg
  • The University of the West Indies
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Morgan State University
  • The University of Texas at Austin
  • West Chester University
  • Northeastern University
  • Universidad Católica del Uruguay
  • Ball State University
  • George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

Résumé

2020 marks the 25th anniversary of the “digital divide.” Although a quarter century has passed, legacy digital inequalities continue, and emergent digital inequalities are proliferating. Many of the initial schisms identified in 1995 are still relevant today. Twenty-five years later, foundational access inequalities continue to separate the digital haves and the digital have-nots within and across countries. In addition, even ubiquitous-access populations are riven with skill inequalities and differentiated usage. Indeed, legacy digital inequalities persist vis-à-vis economic class, gender, sexuality, race and ethnicity, aging, disability, healthcare, education, rural residency, networks, and global geographies. At the same time, emergent forms of inequality now appear alongside legacy inequalities such that notions of digital inequalities must be continually expanded to become more nuanced. We capture the increasingly complex and interrelated nature of digital inequalities by introducing the concept of the “digital inequality stack.” The concept of the digital inequality stack encompasses access to connectivity networks, devices, and software, as well as collective access to network infrastructure. Other layers of the digital inequality stack include differentiated use and consumption, literacies and skills, production and programming, etc. When inequality exists at foundational layers of the digital inequality stack, this often translates into inequalities at higher levels. As we show across these many thematic foci, layers in the digital inequality stack may move in tandem with one another such that all layers of the digital inequality stack reinforce disadvantage.

langue originaleAnglais
journalFirst Monday
Volume25
Numéro de publication7
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 6 juil. 2020

SDG des Nations Unies

Ce résultat contribue à ou aux Objectifs de développement durable suivants

  1. SDG 10 - Inégalités réduites
    SDG 10 Inégalités réduites

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation