Résumé
From our paper, one might expect that the u < d condition on extremal surfaces is necessary and sufficient for holographic scattering in all pure states under consideration. In this erratum, we would like to emphasize a small caveat to this statement.1 onsider a defect geometry with |M| > 1/4. Due to the effect discussed in figure 25, there exist configurations of boundary regions such that the u candidate does not exist. In such cases, it does not make sense to say that the u < d relation controls holographic scattering. (Indeed, one can check in examples that the absence of u is consistent with both scattering and not-scattering.) In Version 2 of our paper on the arXiv, we have added explanations of this point in footnote 3 on page 8, at the bottom of page 10, and in footnote 9 on page 21.
| langue originale | Anglais |
|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 119 |
| journal | Journal of High Energy Physics |
| Volume | 2025 |
| Numéro de publication | 8 |
| Les DOIs |
|
| état | Publié - 1 août 2025 |
Empreinte digitale
Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Erratum to: Holographic scattering and non-minimal RT surfaces (Journal of High Energy Physics, (2024), 2024, 10, (119), 10.1007/JHEP10(2024)119) ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.Contient cette citation
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver