Erratum to: Measurement of the J/ψ pair production cross-section in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV [InlineMediaObject not available: see fulltext.] (J. High Energ. Phys, (2017), 2017, 47, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)047)

The LHCb collaboration

doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)068

Erratum to: Measurement of the J/ψ pair production cross-section in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV [InlineMediaObject not available: see fulltext.] (J. High Energ. Phys, (2017), 2017, 47, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)047)

The LHCb collaboration

European Organization for Nuclear Research
University Santiago de Compostela
University of Bristol
Clermont-Auvergne University
University of Cincinnati
University of Dortmund
University of Glasgow
Science Park 105
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI)
Imperial College London
Instituto de Biofisica da UFRJ
INFN
Laboratoire de l'Accélérateur Linéaire
Tsinghua University
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Firenze
ENAC-IIC-GEL
Sezione INFN di Ferrara
University of Ferrara
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Manchester
University of Heidelberg
Aix-Marseille Université
Kurchatov Institute
Syracuse University
Sezione di Roma
University of Warwick
University of Barcelona
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics
Institute for Nuclear Physics
National Centre for Nuclear Research (NCBJ)
Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa
Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas
INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca
University of Milano-Bicocca
Universités Paris VI and VII
LNF-INFN
Moscow State University
University of Zurich
INFN Sezione di Bologna
University of Birmingham
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Siberian Branch of the RAS
Novosibirsk State University
Sezione INFN di Cagliari
Yandex School of Data Analysis
RWTH Aachen University
University of Liverpool
Universitat Ramon LLull - CSIC
University of Bologna
University of Rome “Tor Vergata”
Sezione di Genova
University of Genoa
University of Edinburgh
Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
Universitá di Cagliari
Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering
University of Padova
INFN Sezione di Bari
Università degli studi di Bari Aldo Moro
Agh University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science
Sezione INFN di Milano
Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology
CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences
University of Milano
University of Valencia
Universidade Federal Do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM)
Universität Rostock
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Institute of Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences in Ukraine
Kurchatov Institute
Iligan Institute of Technology (IIT)
University College Dublin
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Hanoi University of Science
ICS/University of Groningen
University of Pisa
University of Rome
Università degli Studi della Basilicata
Wuhan University
University of Urbino Carlo Bo
Central China Normal University

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal › Commentaire/débat

Résumé

The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to an incorrect propagation of the efficiency values in the final analysis. In this erratum, all tables and figures that need to be corrected are reported, with identical numbering and captions to those in the orginial paper. In figure 2, only the data points are changed. In figure 9, the results of templated double parton scattering (DPS) fit for (Formula Presented.)(the left column) are changed. In table 3, the percentages of the DPS component determined with (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. In table 4, the (Formula Presented.) values from the DPS fits for (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. As a result, the values of (Formula Presented.) for the models considered in the analysis are between 8:8 and 12:5mb, instead of 10:0 and 12:5mb. None of these changes affect the interpretation of the results and the conclusions.

langue originale	Anglais
Numéro d'article	68
journal	Journal of High Energy Physics
Volume	2017
Numéro de publication	10
Les DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2017)068
état	Publié - 1 oct. 2017

Accès au document

10.1007/JHEP10(2017)068

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Erratum to: Measurement of the J/ψ pair production cross-section in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV [InlineMediaObject not available: see fulltext.] (J. High Energ. Phys, (2017), 2017, 47, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)047) ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation

@article{c41c6fc43b014d1c9d23c3fadd85e675,

title = "Erratum to: Measurement of the J/ψ pair production cross-section in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV [InlineMediaObject not available: see fulltext.] (J. High Energ. Phys, (2017), 2017, 47, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)047)",

abstract = "The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to an incorrect propagation of the efficiency values in the final analysis. In this erratum, all tables and figures that need to be corrected are reported, with identical numbering and captions to those in the orginial paper. In figure 2, only the data points are changed. In figure 9, the results of templated double parton scattering (DPS) fit for (Formula Presented.)(the left column) are changed. In table 3, the percentages of the DPS component determined with (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. In table 4, the (Formula Presented.) values from the DPS fits for (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. As a result, the values of (Formula Presented.) for the models considered in the analysis are between 8:8 and 12:5mb, instead of 10:0 and 12:5mb. None of these changes affect the interpretation of the results and the conclusions.",

author = "\{The LHCb collaboration\} and R. Aaij and B. Adeva and M. Adinolfi and Z. Ajaltouni and S. Akar and J. Albrecht and F. Alessio and M. Alexander and S. Ali and G. Alkhazov and Cartelle, \{P. Alvarez\} and Alves, \{A. A.\} and S. Amato and S. Amerio and Y. Amhis and L. An and L. Anderlini and G. Andreassi and M. Andreotti and Andrews, \{J. E.\} and Appleby, \{R. B.\} and F. Archilli and P. d{\textquoteright}Argent and Romeu, \{J. Arnau\} and A. Artamonov and M. Artuso and E. Aslanides and G. Auriemma and M. Baalouch and I. Babuschkin and S. Bachmann and Back, \{J. J.\} and A. Badalov and C. Baesso and S. Baker and V. Balagura and W. Baldini and Barlow, \{R. J.\} and C. Barschel and S. Barsuk and W. Barter and F. Baryshnikov and M. Baszczyk and V. Batozskaya and B. Batsukh and V. Battista and A. Bay and L. Beaucourt and F. Fleuret and E. Maurice",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s).",

year = "2017",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/JHEP10(2017)068",

language = "English",

volume = "2017",

journal = "Journal of High Energy Physics",

issn = "1126-6708",

number = "10",

}

Erratum to: Measurement of the J/ψ pair production cross-section in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV [InlineMediaObject not available: see fulltext.] (J. High Energ. Phys, (2017), 2017, 47, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)047). / The LHCb collaboration.
Dans: Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol 2017, Numéro 10, 68, 01.10.2017.

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal › Commentaire/débat

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum to

T2 - Measurement of the J/ψ pair production cross-section in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV [InlineMediaObject not available: see fulltext.] (J. High Energ. Phys, (2017), 2017, 47, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)047)

AU - The LHCb collaboration

AU - Aaij, R.

AU - Adeva, B.

AU - Adinolfi, M.

AU - Ajaltouni, Z.

AU - Akar, S.

AU - Albrecht, J.

AU - Alessio, F.

AU - Alexander, M.

AU - Ali, S.

AU - Alkhazov, G.

AU - Cartelle, P. Alvarez

AU - Alves, A. A.

AU - Amato, S.

AU - Amerio, S.

AU - Amhis, Y.

AU - An, L.

AU - Anderlini, L.

AU - Andreassi, G.

AU - Andreotti, M.

AU - Andrews, J. E.

AU - Appleby, R. B.

AU - Archilli, F.

AU - d’Argent, P.

AU - Romeu, J. Arnau

AU - Artamonov, A.

AU - Artuso, M.

AU - Aslanides, E.

AU - Auriemma, G.

AU - Baalouch, M.

AU - Babuschkin, I.

AU - Bachmann, S.

AU - Back, J. J.

AU - Badalov, A.

AU - Baesso, C.

AU - Baker, S.

AU - Balagura, V.

AU - Baldini, W.

AU - Barlow, R. J.

AU - Barschel, C.

AU - Barsuk, S.

AU - Barter, W.

AU - Baryshnikov, F.

AU - Baszczyk, M.

AU - Batozskaya, V.

AU - Batsukh, B.

AU - Battista, V.

AU - Bay, A.

AU - Beaucourt, L.

AU - Fleuret, F.

AU - Maurice, E.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to an incorrect propagation of the efficiency values in the final analysis. In this erratum, all tables and figures that need to be corrected are reported, with identical numbering and captions to those in the orginial paper. In figure 2, only the data points are changed. In figure 9, the results of templated double parton scattering (DPS) fit for (Formula Presented.)(the left column) are changed. In table 3, the percentages of the DPS component determined with (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. In table 4, the (Formula Presented.) values from the DPS fits for (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. As a result, the values of (Formula Presented.) for the models considered in the analysis are between 8:8 and 12:5mb, instead of 10:0 and 12:5mb. None of these changes affect the interpretation of the results and the conclusions.

AB - The measurement of the differential cross-section as a function of (Formula Presented.) was incorrectly reported in the paper [1], due to an incorrect propagation of the efficiency values in the final analysis. In this erratum, all tables and figures that need to be corrected are reported, with identical numbering and captions to those in the orginial paper. In figure 2, only the data points are changed. In figure 9, the results of templated double parton scattering (DPS) fit for (Formula Presented.)(the left column) are changed. In table 3, the percentages of the DPS component determined with (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. In table 4, the (Formula Presented.) values from the DPS fits for (Formula Presented.) (the first row) are changed. As a result, the values of (Formula Presented.) for the models considered in the analysis are between 8:8 and 12:5mb, instead of 10:0 and 12:5mb. None of these changes affect the interpretation of the results and the conclusions.

U2 - 10.1007/JHEP10(2017)068

DO - 10.1007/JHEP10(2017)068

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85046792819

SN - 1126-6708

VL - 2017

JO - Journal of High Energy Physics

JF - Journal of High Energy Physics

IS - 10

M1 - 68

ER -