Passer à la navigation principale Passer à la recherche Passer au contenu principal

Granularity adjustment for risk measures: Systematic vs unsystematic risks

  • Patrick Gagliardini
  • , Christian Gouriéroux
  • University of Lugano
  • ENSAE
  • University of Toronto

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal › Article › Revue par des pairs

6 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

The granularity principle (Gordy, 2003) 17 allows for closed form expressions of the risk measures of a large portfolio at order 1/n, where n is the portfolio size. The granularity principle yields a decomposition of such risk measures that highlights the different effects of systematic and unsystematic risks. This paper derives the granularity adjustment of the Value-at-Risk (VaR), the Expected Shortfall and the other distortion risk measures for both static and dynamic risk factor models. The systematic factor can be multidimensional. The methodology is illustrated by several examples, such as the stochastic drift and volatility model, or the dynamic factor model for joint analysis of default and loss given default.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)717-747
Nombre de pages31
journalInternational Journal of Approximate Reasoning
Volume54
Numéro de publication6
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 août 2013
Modification externeOui

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Granularity adjustment for risk measures: Systematic vs unsystematic risks ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation