TY - JOUR
T1 - Interlaboratory study of a supercritical fluid chromatography method for the determination of pharmaceutical impurities
T2 - Evaluation of multi-systems reproducibility
AU - Dispas, Amandine
AU - Clarke, Adrian
AU - Grand-Guillaume Perrenoud, Alexandre
AU - Losacco, Luca Gioacchino
AU - Veuthey, Jean Luc
AU - Gros, Quentin
AU - Molineau, Jérémy
AU - Noireau, Angéline
AU - West, Caroline
AU - Salafia, Fabio
AU - Zoccali, Mariosimone
AU - Mondello, Luigi
AU - Guillen, Amber
AU - Wang, Jenny
AU - Zhang, Kelly
AU - Jochems, Philipp
AU - Schad, Gesa
AU - Nakajima, Kosuke
AU - Horie, Shinnosuke
AU - Joseph, Jan
AU - Parr, Maria Kristina
AU - Billemont, Pierre
AU - Severino, Antoni
AU - Schneider, Sonja
AU - Naegele, Edgar
AU - Kutscher, Daniel
AU - Wikfors, Rick
AU - Black, Regina
AU - Ingvaldson, Lee
AU - Da Silva, Jimmy Oliveira
AU - Bennett, Raffeal
AU - Regalado, Erik L.
AU - Hoang, Thi Phuong Thuy
AU - Touboul, David
AU - Nikolova, Yana
AU - Kamenova-Nacheva, Mariana
AU - Dimitrov, Vladimir
AU - Berger, Blair K.
AU - Schug, Kevin A.
AU - Kerviel-Guillon, Solène
AU - Mauge, Fabien
AU - Takahashi, Masatomo
AU - Izumi, Yoshihiro
AU - Bamba, Takeshi
AU - Rouvière, Florent
AU - Heinisch, Sabine
AU - Guillarme, Davy
AU - Hubert, Philippe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/9/5
Y1 - 2021/9/5
N2 - Modern supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is now a well-established technique, especially in the field of pharmaceutical analysis. We recently demonstrated the transferability and the reproducibility of a SFC-UV method for pharmaceutical impurities by means of an inter-laboratory study. However, as this study involved only one brand of SFC instrumentation (Waters®), the present study extends the purpose to multi-instrumentation evaluation. Specifically, three instrument types, namely Agilent®, Shimadzu®, and Waters®, were included through 21 laboratories (n = 7 for each instrument). First, method transfer was performed to assess the separation quality and to set up the specific instrument parameters of Agilent® and Shimadzu® instruments. Second, the inter-laboratory study was performed following a protocol defined by the sending lab. Analytical results were examined regarding consistencies within- and between-laboratories criteria. Afterwards, the method reproducibility was estimated taking into account variances in replicates, between-days and between-laboratories. Reproducibility variance was larger than that observed during the first study involving only one single type of instrumentation. Indeed, we clearly observed an ‘instrument type’ effect. Moreover, the reproducibility variance was larger when considering all instruments than each type separately which can be attributed to the variability induced by the instrument configuration. Nevertheless, repeatability and reproducibility variances were found to be similar than those described for LC methods; i.e. reproducibility as %RSD was around 15 %. These results highlighted the robustness and the power of modern analytical SFC technologies to deliver accurate results for pharmaceutical quality control analysis.
AB - Modern supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) is now a well-established technique, especially in the field of pharmaceutical analysis. We recently demonstrated the transferability and the reproducibility of a SFC-UV method for pharmaceutical impurities by means of an inter-laboratory study. However, as this study involved only one brand of SFC instrumentation (Waters®), the present study extends the purpose to multi-instrumentation evaluation. Specifically, three instrument types, namely Agilent®, Shimadzu®, and Waters®, were included through 21 laboratories (n = 7 for each instrument). First, method transfer was performed to assess the separation quality and to set up the specific instrument parameters of Agilent® and Shimadzu® instruments. Second, the inter-laboratory study was performed following a protocol defined by the sending lab. Analytical results were examined regarding consistencies within- and between-laboratories criteria. Afterwards, the method reproducibility was estimated taking into account variances in replicates, between-days and between-laboratories. Reproducibility variance was larger than that observed during the first study involving only one single type of instrumentation. Indeed, we clearly observed an ‘instrument type’ effect. Moreover, the reproducibility variance was larger when considering all instruments than each type separately which can be attributed to the variability induced by the instrument configuration. Nevertheless, repeatability and reproducibility variances were found to be similar than those described for LC methods; i.e. reproducibility as %RSD was around 15 %. These results highlighted the robustness and the power of modern analytical SFC technologies to deliver accurate results for pharmaceutical quality control analysis.
KW - Inter-laboratory study
KW - Multi-instruments collaborative study
KW - Pharmaceutical impurities
KW - Reproducibility
KW - Salbutamol sulfate
KW - Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC)
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114206
DO - 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114206
M3 - Article
C2 - 34146950
AN - SCOPUS:85107973437
SN - 0731-7085
VL - 203
JO - Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
JF - Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
M1 - 114206
ER -