Passer à la navigation principale Passer à la recherche Passer au contenu principal

Interobserver agreement issues in radiology

  • INSERM U869
  • Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires
  • ENSAE
  • Université de Montpellier 2
  • Sorbonne Université
  • Pôle de Biologie
  • Pôle Gérontologie

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

Résumé

Agreement between observers (i.e., inter-rater agreement) can be quantified with various criteria but their appropriate selections are critical. When the measure is qualitative (nominal or ordinal), the proportion of agreement or the kappa coefficient should be used to evaluate inter-rater consistency (i.e., inter-rater reliability). The kappa coefficient is more meaningful that the raw percentage of agreement, because the latter does not account for agreements due to chance alone. When the measures are quantitative, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) should be used to assess agreement but this should be done with care because there are different ICCs so that it is important to describe the model and type of ICC being used. The Bland-Altman method can be used to assess consistency and conformity but its use should be restricted to comparison of two raters.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)639-641
Nombre de pages3
journalDiagnostic and Interventional Imaging
Volume101
Numéro de publication10
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 oct. 2020
Modification externeOui

Empreinte digitale

Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Interobserver agreement issues in radiology ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.

Contient cette citation