Le système européen de quotas de CO2: Faut-il jeter le «navire amiral» avec l'eau du bain ?

Frédéric Branger; Oskar Lecuyer; Philippe Quirion

Le système européen de quotas de CO₂: Faut-il jeter le «navire amiral» avec l'eau du bain ?

Frédéric Branger
, Oskar Lecuyer
, Philippe Quirion

CIRED

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journal › Article › Revue par des pairs

Résumé

The European Union emission trading system has been criticized by various stakeholders. We review the main criticisms and end up with the following conclusions: abatement has been real, albeit small, no noticeable loss of competitiveness or carbon leakage occurred, the distributional effects were unfair and major fraud occurred. Some of these problems could have been avoided and can still be corrected by adopting a more critical approach toward flexibility mechanisms and setting a CO₂ floor price.

Titre traduit de la contribution	The European Union Emissions Trading System: Should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater?
langue originale	Français
Pages (de - à)	299-317
Nombre de pages	19
journal	Economies et Societes
Volume	47
Numéro de publication	2
état	Publié - 1 févr. 2013
Modification externe	Oui

SDG des Nations Unies

Ce résultat contribue à ou aux Objectifs de développement durable suivants

SDG 1 Pas de pauvreté

Autres fichiers et liens

Lien vers la publication dans Scopus

Contient cette citation

@article{6aedf027ac7d4a658e2e80f2001cd34a,

title = "Le syst{\`e}me europ{\'e}en de quotas de CO2: Faut-il jeter le «navire amiral» avec l'eau du bain ?",

abstract = "The European Union emission trading system has been criticized by various stakeholders. We review the main criticisms and end up with the following conclusions: abatement has been real, albeit small, no noticeable loss of competitiveness or carbon leakage occurred, the distributional effects were unfair and major fraud occurred. Some of these problems could have been avoided and can still be corrected by adopting a more critical approach toward flexibility mechanisms and setting a CO2 floor price.",

author = "Fr{\'e}d{\'e}ric Branger and Oskar Lecuyer and Philippe Quirion",

year = "2013",

month = feb,

day = "1",

language = "Fran{\c c}ais",

volume = "47",

pages = "299--317",

journal = "Economies et Societes",

issn = "0013-0567",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Le système européen de quotas de CO2

T2 - Faut-il jeter le «navire amiral» avec l'eau du bain ?

AU - Branger, Frédéric

AU - Lecuyer, Oskar

AU - Quirion, Philippe

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - The European Union emission trading system has been criticized by various stakeholders. We review the main criticisms and end up with the following conclusions: abatement has been real, albeit small, no noticeable loss of competitiveness or carbon leakage occurred, the distributional effects were unfair and major fraud occurred. Some of these problems could have been avoided and can still be corrected by adopting a more critical approach toward flexibility mechanisms and setting a CO2 floor price.

AB - The European Union emission trading system has been criticized by various stakeholders. We review the main criticisms and end up with the following conclusions: abatement has been real, albeit small, no noticeable loss of competitiveness or carbon leakage occurred, the distributional effects were unfair and major fraud occurred. Some of these problems could have been avoided and can still be corrected by adopting a more critical approach toward flexibility mechanisms and setting a CO2 floor price.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84877790656

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84877790656

SN - 0013-0567

VL - 47

SP - 299

EP - 317

JO - Economies et Societes

JF - Economies et Societes

IS - 2