TY - JOUR
T1 - Lung- and diaphragm-protective mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome
AU - Plens, Glauco M.
AU - Morris, Idunn S.
AU - Greendyk, Richard
AU - Castellví-Font, Andrea
AU - Jonkman, Annemijn H.
AU - Grieco, Domenico L.
AU - Alcala, Glasiele C.
AU - Dianti, Jose
AU - Amato, Marcelo Britto Passos
AU - Dres, Martin
AU - Bihari, Shailesh
AU - Khemani, Robinder G.
AU - Brochard, Laurent
AU - Itagaki, Taiga
AU - Goligher, Ewan C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - Lung-protective ventilation is the current standard for mechanical ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Traditionally, this approach has focused on the controlled phase of mechanical ventilation, but emerging data suggest that how patients are managed during assisted ventilation may also impact clinical outcomes. Experimental and observational clinical data indicate that excessive respiratory effort may further damage already injured lungs and may also lead to diaphragm myotrauma. Conversely, insufficient effort and prolonged passive ventilation are associated with diaphragm atrophy and dysfunction. Recent non-invasive techniques to monitor respiratory drive and effort at the bedside have facilitated the development of a new strategy to protect both the lungs and the diaphragm. The lung- and diaphragm-protective (LDP) ventilation framework highlights the need to better integrate ventilation and sedation strategies to facilitate timely and safe spontaneous breathing. This new paradigm has driven the development of emerging supportive and therapeutic modalities, such as diaphragm neurostimulation and partial neuromuscular blockade. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the impact of LDP strategies on patient-centered outcomes, using designs that account for the possibility of heterogeneity of treatment effect in the ARDS population. In this review, we summarize the physiological background for the LDP framework, as well as the current clinical evidence evaluating this strategy. Visual abstract: (Figure presented.)
AB - Lung-protective ventilation is the current standard for mechanical ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Traditionally, this approach has focused on the controlled phase of mechanical ventilation, but emerging data suggest that how patients are managed during assisted ventilation may also impact clinical outcomes. Experimental and observational clinical data indicate that excessive respiratory effort may further damage already injured lungs and may also lead to diaphragm myotrauma. Conversely, insufficient effort and prolonged passive ventilation are associated with diaphragm atrophy and dysfunction. Recent non-invasive techniques to monitor respiratory drive and effort at the bedside have facilitated the development of a new strategy to protect both the lungs and the diaphragm. The lung- and diaphragm-protective (LDP) ventilation framework highlights the need to better integrate ventilation and sedation strategies to facilitate timely and safe spontaneous breathing. This new paradigm has driven the development of emerging supportive and therapeutic modalities, such as diaphragm neurostimulation and partial neuromuscular blockade. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the impact of LDP strategies on patient-centered outcomes, using designs that account for the possibility of heterogeneity of treatment effect in the ARDS population. In this review, we summarize the physiological background for the LDP framework, as well as the current clinical evidence evaluating this strategy. Visual abstract: (Figure presented.)
KW - Acute respiratory distress syndrome
KW - Diaphragm
KW - Mechanical ventilation
KW - Ventilator-induced lung injury
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105044174521
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-026-08535-x
DO - 10.1007/s00134-026-08535-x
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105044174521
SN - 0342-4642
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
ER -