MOFs, cofs, and zifs plus h2 and CH4 Storage

William A. Goddard

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18778-1_59

MOFs, cofs, and zifs plus h₂ and CH₄ Storage

William A. Goddard

California Institute of Technology

Résultats de recherche: Le chapitre dans un livre, un rapport, une anthologie ou une collection › Chapitre › Revue par des pairs

Résumé

In the early 2000s, there was a great deal of interest in finding materials that could store H₂ at high density and small volume for use in H₂ fuel cells, particularly for transportation. The concern was that pressured H₂ gas would be too dangerous. DOE set standards but no experimental system came close. It seems like the industry has decided that pressured H₂ is OK. In 2004 we designed a series of systems that met DOE standards for H₂ and CH₄ storage, but generally did not find experimentalists to test our designs. Then in 2006 I learned about the MOF’s being developed by my friend Omar Yaghi at UCLA that I thought would be ideal for storing H₂ and CH₄. We did a series of papers, sometimes in collaboration with Omar, showing designs of MOFs and later COFs that would satisfy DOE requirements.

langue originale	Anglais
titre	Springer Series in Materials Science
Editeur	Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Pages	1187-1192
Nombre de pages	6
Les DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18778-1_59
état	Publié - 1 janv. 2021
Modification externe	Oui

Série de publications

Nom	Springer Series in Materials Science
Volume	284
ISSN (imprimé)	0933-033X
ISSN (Electronique)	2196-2812

Accès au document

10.1007/978-3-030-18778-1_59

Contient cette citation

@inbook{80e6f4255bed4bd58fc42f80bfd6f369,

title = "MOFs, cofs, and zifs plus h2 and CH4 Storage",

abstract = "In the early 2000s, there was a great deal of interest in finding materials that could store H2 at high density and small volume for use in H2 fuel cells, particularly for transportation. The concern was that pressured H2 gas would be too dangerous. DOE set standards but no experimental system came close. It seems like the industry has decided that pressured H2 is OK. In 2004 we designed a series of systems that met DOE standards for H2 and CH4 storage, but generally did not find experimentalists to test our designs. Then in 2006 I learned about the MOF{\textquoteright}s being developed by my friend Omar Yaghi at UCLA that I thought would be ideal for storing H2 and CH4. We did a series of papers, sometimes in collaboration with Omar, showing designs of MOFs and later COFs that would satisfy DOE requirements.",

author = "Goddard, \{William A.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.",

year = "2021",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-18778-1\_59",

language = "English",

series = "Springer Series in Materials Science",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",

pages = "1187--1192",

booktitle = "Springer Series in Materials Science",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - MOFs, cofs, and zifs plus h2 and CH4 Storage

AU - Goddard, William A.

PY - 2021/1/1

Y1 - 2021/1/1

N2 - In the early 2000s, there was a great deal of interest in finding materials that could store H2 at high density and small volume for use in H2 fuel cells, particularly for transportation. The concern was that pressured H2 gas would be too dangerous. DOE set standards but no experimental system came close. It seems like the industry has decided that pressured H2 is OK. In 2004 we designed a series of systems that met DOE standards for H2 and CH4 storage, but generally did not find experimentalists to test our designs. Then in 2006 I learned about the MOF’s being developed by my friend Omar Yaghi at UCLA that I thought would be ideal for storing H2 and CH4. We did a series of papers, sometimes in collaboration with Omar, showing designs of MOFs and later COFs that would satisfy DOE requirements.

AB - In the early 2000s, there was a great deal of interest in finding materials that could store H2 at high density and small volume for use in H2 fuel cells, particularly for transportation. The concern was that pressured H2 gas would be too dangerous. DOE set standards but no experimental system came close. It seems like the industry has decided that pressured H2 is OK. In 2004 we designed a series of systems that met DOE standards for H2 and CH4 storage, but generally did not find experimentalists to test our designs. Then in 2006 I learned about the MOF’s being developed by my friend Omar Yaghi at UCLA that I thought would be ideal for storing H2 and CH4. We did a series of papers, sometimes in collaboration with Omar, showing designs of MOFs and later COFs that would satisfy DOE requirements.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-18778-1_59

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-18778-1_59

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85101170695

T3 - Springer Series in Materials Science

SP - 1187

EP - 1192

BT - Springer Series in Materials Science

PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH