Résumé
With four major companies sharing more than 85% of the market, the recording industry is one of the most concentrated industries. While this market concentration has been traditionally linked with high barriers to entry, recent technological changes have made these barriers almost disappear. Nonetheless, market concentration remains, mostly due to IPRs protecting major companies. This has traditionally been considered acceptable due to the high sunk costs of music recording that prevent an efficient outcome in a competitive environment. This article calls this traditional wisdom into question and demonstrates that the majors are not only monopolies but also monoposonies: they are monometapolies. It is shown that the negative effects of a monometapoly are worse than those of a simple monopoly and that the loss of welfare indirectly caused by IPRs is likely to be much higher than is usually expected.
| langue originale | Anglais |
|---|---|
| Pages (de - à) | 211-222 |
| Nombre de pages | 12 |
| journal | Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation |
| Volume | 27 |
| Numéro de publication | 3 |
| Les DOIs | |
| état | Publié - 1 sept. 2009 |
| Modification externe | Oui |
Empreinte digitale
Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Monometapoly or the Economics of the Music Industry ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.Contient cette citation
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver