Résumé
For some time now, historians of humanities and social science have taken some of their most famous categories of analysis as subjects of their own research: “ethnicity”, “race”, and “class”, for instance. This did not occur with the meta-categories which structure knowledge, and indeed they are often considered to be self-evident. This article weaves between France, Great Britain and German-speaking lands to reconstruct the shifting appropriations and meanings, and also rejections, of the categories “sciences morales et politiques”, “moral sciences”, and “Geisteswissenschaften”. In so doing, it exposes the scientific, academic, political and nationalist forces at work. It thus also, reflexively, comments on its own research field and how it has been carved out.
| Titre traduit de la contribution | Moral Sciences, Geisteswissenschaften (1750-1900). Transnational trajectories of scholarly labelling |
|---|---|
| langue originale | Français |
| Pages (de - à) | 121-141 |
| Nombre de pages | 21 |
| journal | Revue d'Histoire des Sciences Humaines |
| Numéro de publication | 37 |
| Les DOIs | |
| état | Publié - 1 janv. 2020 |
mots-clés
- Geisteswissenschaften
- History of the humanities and social science
- Meta-categories
- Moral sciences
- Sciences morales et politiques
Empreinte digitale
Examiner les sujets de recherche de « Moral sciences, Geisteswissenschaften (1795-1900): Parcours transnationaux d'étiquetages savants ». Ensemble, ils forment une empreinte digitale unique.Contient cette citation
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver