TY - GEN
T1 - Optimal Operation of a Building with Electricity-Heat Networks and Seasonal Storage
AU - Prat, Eléa
AU - Pinson, Pierre
AU - Lusby, Richard M.
AU - Plougonven, Riwal
AU - Badosa, Jordi
AU - Drobinski, Philippe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - As seasonal thermal energy storage emerges as an efficient solution to reduce CO2 emissions of buildings, challenges appear related to its optimal operation. In a system including short-term electricity storage, long-term heat storage, and where electricity and heat networks are connected through a heat pump, it becomes crucial to operate the system on two time scales. Based on real data from a university building, we simulate the operation of such a system over a year, comparing different strategies based on model predictive control (MPC). The first objective of this paper is to determine the minimum prediction horizon to retrieve the results of the full-horizon operation problem with cost minimization. The second objective is to evaluate a method that combines MPC with setting targets on the heat storage level at the end of the prediction horizon, based on historical data. For a prediction horizon of 6 days, the suboptimality gap with the full-horizon results is 4.31%, compared to 11.42% when using a prediction horizon of 42 days and fixing the final level to be equal to the initial level, which is a common approach.
AB - As seasonal thermal energy storage emerges as an efficient solution to reduce CO2 emissions of buildings, challenges appear related to its optimal operation. In a system including short-term electricity storage, long-term heat storage, and where electricity and heat networks are connected through a heat pump, it becomes crucial to operate the system on two time scales. Based on real data from a university building, we simulate the operation of such a system over a year, comparing different strategies based on model predictive control (MPC). The first objective of this paper is to determine the minimum prediction horizon to retrieve the results of the full-horizon operation problem with cost minimization. The second objective is to evaluate a method that combines MPC with setting targets on the heat storage level at the end of the prediction horizon, based on historical data. For a prediction horizon of 6 days, the suboptimality gap with the full-horizon results is 4.31%, compared to 11.42% when using a prediction horizon of 42 days and fixing the final level to be equal to the initial level, which is a common approach.
KW - mixed integer linear programming
KW - model predictive control
KW - rolling horizon
KW - seasonal storage
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/86000021746
U2 - 10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863412
DO - 10.1109/ISGTEUROPE62998.2024.10863412
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:86000021746
T3 - IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe, ISGT EUROPE 2024
BT - IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe, ISGT EUROPE 2024
A2 - Holjevac, Ninoslav
A2 - Baskarad, Tomislav
A2 - Zidar, Matija
A2 - Kuzle, Igor
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2024 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe Conference, ISGT EUROPE 2024
Y2 - 14 October 2024 through 17 October 2024
ER -